fufor's unregelmässige news

Israeli Snipers Killing US Troops In Iraq
Source: Joanna Francis and CNN
11-11-6

Anderson Cooper of CNN showed this video of snipers killing U.S. troops in Iraq on his October 18, 2006 show. CNN says it obtained the video from a "representative" of an unnamed "insurgent leader." Bear in mind that Anderson Cooper used to work for the CIA.

Richard Wilson's hypothesis: Israeli soldiers and/or Mossad agents are killing our soldiers in Iraq in order to enrage American troops so that the slaughter continues.

Proof: At the very beginning of this video clip, you see a rifle with a video camera attached to it. This weapon is made by the Rafael company, an Israeli arms manufacturer, that also makes IEDs. If you watch the video all the way through, it explains how this rifle works. CNN stated that the camera used to film these shootings was not a mounted rifle camera. But as you watch the video, you see that with each shot fired, the camera recoils. That would only happen if it were mounted on the rifle. Why is this significant? Because this kind of rifle-camera is extremely sophisticated and not available to your average Iraqi insurgent. I mean, it's not exactly an easily obtainable Saturday night special! Something this sophisticated points to Mossad.

Mossad is a master at false flag operations, e.g., Oklahoma City, the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, the bombing of the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires, the July 7, 2005 London bombings, the 9-11 attacks in New York, the assassination of the Prime Minister in Beirut, the stoking of Muslim riots in France last year, the bombing of the Hassan al-Askari Mosque in Samarra, Iraq, etc.

Israelis freely move among US and UK troops in Iraq, and have access to top-level US intelligence. Until July 2003, the head of all US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan was General Tommy Franks, a Zionist Jew. (He is now on the board of directors for Bank of America.) On November 7, 2006 another Zionist Jew became a principle liaison between Mossad and US forces in Iraq: Major General Richard F. Natonski of the Marine Corps. His title is Deputy Commandant for Plans, Policies and Operations.

Because of this access, the "insurgents" (i.e., Mossad agents) know exactly where US vehicles will be and who will be inside them. This allows them to target for maximum false flag effect.

For example, on July 23, 2005, a detachment of 19 female US Marines was sent to Fallujah to check Iraqi women for bombs. An IED blew up their truck. Two of the young American women were killed, five were critically wounded, and four were captured. The bodies of the four captured women turned up later in a garbage dump with their throats cut. Americans were outraged. Islamic clerics insisted that only Israelis could be so cold-blooded. And who was in charge of US forces in Fallujah at the time? None other than Major General Natonski, the Mossad liaison.

Americans are supposed to believe that rag-tag "insurgents" use IEDs powerful enough to kill three US troops per day, on average. An American soldier even set up a blog on how "Intel" is betraying and targeting US troops. But sometimes Mossad bomb-makers accidentally blow themselves upin Iraq.

According to Richard Wilson, Israeli sniping and IEDs are false flag operations. He says that on March 28, 2005, Americans arrested 19 Mossad agents who fired twice on a US Marine checkpoint. The Marines beat up the Mossad agents and tore off their Star-of-David necklaces. (The US media incorrectly said the agents were Americans.) The Mossad agents said they were employees of Zapata Engineering, which helps the CIA conduct interrogations, and also manages US ammo dumps and US motor pools in Iraq.

IEDs in Iraq are powerful enough to flip over a 70-ton tank. Some of the models shoot depleted-uranium projectiles, and are triggered by electronic devices surreptitiously planted on US armored vehicles. Zapata Engineering (which employs Mossad agents) makes this exact kind of trigger, and oversees some of the US motor pools.

Rumsfeld says the IEDs come from Iran, but Richard says they come from Mossad, and are not "improvised" at all. The Israeli company, Rafael (see above), makes IEDS, which are buried in the middle of a road. Beside the road is a device which emits a laser or radio signal. This device is manufactured by firms like Zapata Engineering, which is controlled by Zionist Jews. The IED mine, manufactured by Israel, is inert until a US vehicle (secretly planted with a triggering device) rolls over it.

Whenever Mossad carries out these false-flag operations they produce a videotape or a recording from an "unnamed source" that is "close to al-Qaeda." Sometimes they say "the claim was posted on an Internet website, but its authenticity could not be verified."

But Israelis would never kill anyone in cold blood, would they? After all, the USS Liberty massacre was "an accident!"
http://tinyurl.com/ybyqtc

Stealth Bomber Scientist gave China stealth technology
Published on 11/11/2006

Source: Honolulu Advertiser / Via: What Really Happened
By Peter Boylan
Advertiser Staff Writer
A scientist who developed the stealth bomber's engine allegedly tried to help China develop technology that would render cruise missiles undetectable to radar, according to an 18-count federal indictment unsealed yesterday.

Noshir S. Gowadia, a 62-year-old resident of Ha'iku, Maui, allegedly provided "substantial defense-related services for the People's Republic of China by agreeing to design and later designing a low observable cruise missile exhaust system nozzle capable of rendering the missile less susceptible to detection and interception," according to the U.S. attorney's office.

Details of the government's case against Gowadia were contained in a superseding indictment issued by a federal grand jury yesterday. The new indictment specifically names the countries Gowadia allegedly worked with, including China, Switzerland, Germany and Israel, and details his alleged activities while overseas.

It also raises the possibility of the death penalty.

"As charged in the superseding indictment, the defendant in this case attempted to profit from his know-how and his knowledge of sensitive military technology," said Kenneth L. Wainstein, assistant attorney general for the U.S. Department of Justice's national security division, in a news release yesterday. "This case demonstrates that the DOJ will vigorously prosecute those who illegally transfer such information and services to foreign countries."

A call to the Chinese Consulate in Los Angeles was not returned last night.

Lawyer Chris Todd of the Washington, D.C., firm Kellog, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel has previously represented Gowadia. A call to his office was not immediately returned yesterday. A call to Gowadia's Ha'iku home was not answered.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Ken Sorenson, who is prosecuting the case for the government, declined comment, pending a status conference in the case scheduled for today.

The indictment lists one count of conspiring to violate the Arms Export Control Act, one count of performing a defense service without obtaining approval from the U.S. Department of State, and three counts of willfully communicating classified national defense information to Chinese defense officials.

The indictment also includes four counts of money laundering connected to allegations that Gowadia disguised funds paid to him by the Chinese government for his services.

LIFE TERM OR DEATH

If convicted of the new charges, which supersede a six-count indictment against Gowadia handed down in October 2005, Gowadia faces up to life in prison or the death penalty "if certain statutory criteria are met" and fines totaling $250,000 and possible property forfeiture.

He is scheduled to appear for a status conference before federal Magistrate Judge Kevin S.C. Chang this morning at 10.

Gowadia has been held without bail at the Federal Detention Center since Oct. 26, 2005.

Prior to the current indictment, Gowadia, a former design engineer for a defense contractor, had been accused of selling classified information about the B-2 stealth bomber to foreign governments, including Germany, Switzerland and Israel. Gowadia attempted to sell stealth technology to Germany and Israel to help disguise the heat signatures of commercial aircraft, according to court documents. Switzerland was interested in similar technology for a helicopter.

The indictment does not say if the sales were successful.

Gowadia, a naturalized citizen who moved to the United States from Bombay, India, when he was 18, was an engineer with Northrop Corp. from 1968 to 1986 and was the chief designer of the B-2's infrared-suppressing propulsion system, the federal government has said. The technology remains classified.

According to the 49-page indictment, Gowadia from January 2002 until January 2006 conspired with Chinese counterparts to willfully "export defense services and technical data, to include classified information to the People's Republic of China without having first obtained a validated license or written approval from the U.S. Department of State."

Gowadia allegedly traveled to China on at least six occasions between July 2003 and June 2005 and met with Chinese government engineers in order to disclose "technical defense data and provide defense services," according to the indictment.

The government accuses Gowadia of designing and helping with the testing of "advanced propulsion system technologies and low observable technologies for the specific purpose of assisting the PRC in designing, testing and analyzing a low observable exhaust nozzle, optimized for significant reduction in the infrared heat signature for a PRC cruise missile," court documents say.

PAY PUT AT $110,000

The PRC paid Gowadia $110,000 for his work, according to the documents, which he allegedly smuggled into the country through various means, including declaring one $10,000 payment as intended to buy an antique desk. Gowadia is charged with several counts of money laundering in connection with his handling of the payments.

Gowadia's alleged co-conspirator, Tommy Wong, who worked for the Chinese government's State Bureau of Foreign Experts, allegedly helped Gowadia forge stamps on his passport and paid for all of Gowadia's expenses in China in order to disguise his entry and travel within the country, the papers state.

On April 22, 2004, Wong met Gowadia at the airport in Hong Kong and arranged for him to enter China without having his passport stamped, court papers show.

Gowadia sent PowerPoint files, numerous other files, blueprints, and other data concerning U.S. stealth and propulsion technology via e-mail to his co-conspirators, the documents state.

Meetings between Gowadia and Chinese officials took place in Hong Kong, Chengdu, Shenzen, and Beijing, often at government facilities.

On June 23, 2004, Gowadia traveled to Beijing with Wong and was given a tour of an aeronautical facility where the nozzles he helped develop would be tested, according to court documents.
http://tinyurl.com/yaywlf

Outrage at London sting by US spies
By CHRISTOPHER LEAKE, Mail on Sunday
11/11/06 - News section

Undercover American agents are staging secret 'sting' operations in Britain against criminal and terrorist suspects they want to extradite to the US.
In a recent operation, agents from America's Department of Homeland Security set up a suspect by posing as dealers wanting to illegally sell night-vision goggles for export to Iran.

The spies arranged a series of clandestine meetings in London hotels, which they secretly filmed as evidence. It is thought to be the first time American agents have been caught using such sting tactics in Britain.

Urgent questions were being asked about whether the British Government had been aware of the operation. If so, it raises issues of the State collaborating with foreign agencies to entrap suspects - and if not it raises the spectre of American spies working unchecked on British soil.

Human rights campaigners demanded an explanation from Home Secretary John Reid and Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett.

The case has provoked a huge row because the agents used tactics banned in Britain. In addition, the offence of which he is accused would not be a crime in this country. If British police officers had employed this type of sting, the ensuing case would almost certainly be thrown out of court.

In July 2003, ten defendants accused of laundering £15million walked free from Southwark Crown Court after Judge George Bathurst-Norman described police actions as 'massively illegal'. The judge said a police sting aimed at trapping them had 'overstepped the line between legitimate crime detection and unacceptable crime creation'.

Following the US spy sting an Iranian-born businessman - named by Whitehall officials last night as former Iranian ambassador to Jordan Nosratollah Tajik - now faces extradition to America.

Mr Tajik, who has lived with his family in Britain for several years, is accused of conspiring to sell military equipment to Islamic extremists. He was arrested on the Americans' behalf by British police officers before the alleged deal went ahead and detained in prison for a week.

The sting operation also raises new questions about Britain's one-sided extradition arrangements with the United States, under which British citizens can be sent across the Atlantic for trial with ease.

It is much harder for British authorities to extradite American citizens to the UK.

During the operation, the undercover American agents, who were unarmed, claimed they wanted to sell night-vision goggles, said to be worth £50,000, for export to Iran, in breach of US export controls.

Mr Tajik, who is 52 and was recently in hospital with a serious illness, has since been released on substantial bail and has reported daily to a police station near his Durham home. He is an honorary fellow of Durham University's Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies and has an engineering degree from the University of Westminster.

Mr Tajik is now due to appear at an extradition hearing at City of Westminster magistrates court on December 4.

The Mail on Sunday understands Mr Tajik's legal team will claim he has no terrorist connections or criminal record and that the American agents acted illegally as 'agents provocateurs' by trapping him.

Sources close to Mr Tajik say he feels he is being made a scapegoat for America's opposition to Iran, and the case could widen the rift between America and Iran because of Mr Tajik's former diplomatic role.

According to a witness at a House of Representatives inquiry into state-sponsored terrorism in Iran in February last year, Mr Tajik was one of several Iranian diplomats recruiting Palestinians to establish terrorist cells.

Matthew Levitt, director of terrorism studies at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said: "Iran actively recruits Palestinians for terrorist training in its camps."

He added: "Iran arranged for free travel, medical treatment and terrorist training for Palestinians who had been wounded in the violence in the Middle East who then returned to the Palestinian territories to establish terrorist cells. Among those involved in the recruitment drive were...Iranian ambassador to Jordan Nosratollah Tajik."

Iran, along with Syria, is also the main sponsor of Hezbollah.

It is not known whether the sting operation is connected to a British investigation launched in August after Israel accused Britain of indirectly supplying Hezbollah terrorists with military night-vision equipment that helped them target Israeli soldiers in Lebanon.

The batch of 250 systems, each stamped "Made in Britain', was discovered by Israeli troops in Hezbollah command bunkers in southern Lebanon. Israel demanded to know whether the night-vision gear was part of a batch sold by Britain to Iran in 2003 for use against drug smugglers.

The sting comes just days after it was revealed that Home Office Ministers signed away crucial British extradition rights with America without holding a single meeting with their US counterparts. The Government last month defeated attempts to block further 'fast-track' extraditions despite a rebellion by backbench Labour MPs.

Critics of the 2003 treaty claim that the burden of proof now required makes it too easy for US authorities to demand that British subjects stand trial in America, as demonstrated by the recent case of the NatWest Three.

British bankers Gary Mulgrew, David Bermingham and Giles Derby fought a long-running but unsuccessful battle to avoid extradition on fraud charges related to the collapse of energy giant Enron. They were extradited in July, and were not allowed to return to the UK despite being granted bail. Their trial will be held in Houston, Texas, next year.

Shami Chakrabarti, director of the human rights group Liberty, said last night: "We already have a one-sided extradition arrangement that allows people to be bundled off to America without so much as a by-your-leave. Now we have US agents operating in Britain entrapping people into criminality in the first place.

"The Home Secretary and the Foreign Secretary must tell us the nature of these agents' operations in Britain."

Liberal Democrat Home Affairs spokesman Nick Clegg said last night: "The case of rendition flights to transport�American prisoners for interrogation in other countries raised concerns about the degree to which the American security services run operations on British soil without the full knowledge of the British Government.

"Everyone wants the British and American security services to co-operate well, but we don't want a situation in which American authorities can act on British soil with complete impunity and without regard for British domestic law."

The Metropolitan Police refused to comment on the case. A spokesman said: "We do not discuss our investigative techniques, but we do nothing that is illegal and we work to Home Office guidelines."

A Home Office spokeswoman said: "We are aware that this man is wanted by the US Government on charges of alleged arms sales. The matter is before the courts, so we cannot comment."
http://tinyurl.com/yg3mbr

Iran claims presence of a US aircraft carrier cruising in Gulf waters
posted Sunday, 12 November 2006

TEHRAN: Iran's Arabic language television station broadcast footage showed a US aircraft carrier cruising in Gulf waters, the report said the footage was shown from a film taken by an unmanned Iranian drone.

The brief minute-long film, which was shown on the TV in evening news bulletin, showed wobbly aerial footage of an aircraft carrier stacked with warplanes as it sailed.

The television's anchor said the film, the property of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard, showed a vessel from "the US fleet in the Persian Gulf".

"A source in the Revolutionary Guard said the drone carried out its mission without US fighter pilots reaching it," the television said.

It said there were 10 such films taken by the drone, which showed "more precise information and details about military equipment, foreign forces, and their activities in the Persian Gulf."

The station did not name the vessel nor did it say when the footage was shot.

The broadcast comes near the end of Iran's latest 10-day war games, "Great Prophet II", which military chiefs have said were aimed at showing off Iran's defensive prowess and testing new military hardware.

The war games coincided with US-led naval manoeuvres in the Gulf off Iran aimed at halting arms-trafficking, the first time such an exercise has been held in the area.
http://tinyurl.com/yfeq6z