fufor's unregelmässige news

UFO Landing and Humanoids in Poland - From Crop Circle Investigator Nancy Talbott

FIELD REPORT:
UFO LANDING TRACE = CROPCIRCLE?

by
Nancy Talbott
BLT Research Team Inc.
Cambridge, MA (USA)
2/28/07



Location: nr. Szczecinek, in Northern Poland
Event Date: August 11, 2003
Event Time: 4:35 - 4:50 am
Primary Witness: Lech Chacinski
Translator: Less Hodun
N.Talbott's Interviews: October, 2006 & February, 2007

On April 26, 2004 Rense.com posted an intriguing report from Brian Vike (HBCC UFO Research) of a "close encounter of the third kind" which had occurred in a rural area of northern Poland 8 months previously (Vike's source: Tomek Wierszalowicz). Of great interest to me was the fact that the witness had discovered flattened areas of crop pressed into the field after the UFO departed—several circles arranged in a configuration which, from the photographs provided, looked exactly like what I would have called a crop circle. Could this be the first clear evidence of UFOs as the direct causative agent in the creation of at least some crop circles?
In October, 2006 I met with the eyewitness at a Conference in Warsaw where we were both speaking, and then spent another day with him on a road-trip to Zdany (where members of the Nautilus group and I were investigating another UFO incident). Translators provided at the Nautilus Conference were excellent, and subsequent intensive questioning by me of Mr. Chacinski and his friend Zbyszek Kalisiak (in-depth translations for this report carried out by Less Hodun) has revealed a number of corrections to the original report, as well as many addtional details.

I am convinced both of Mr. Chacinski's total honesty and his ability to accurately recount the details of this incident, and have therefore realized that crop circles— which I have always thought were not directly related to UFOs—sometimes are.

Following is a compilation of Brian Vike's original April 26, 2004 report (see: www.rense.com/general52/fsffee.htm), amended with the new details, photos and illustrations provided by Mr. Chacinski in mid-October, 2006 and in February, 2007. Click here for a TV interview (in Polish) conducted with Mr. Chacinski in 2003: 34,7MB WMV File (file will automatically download on MAC computers).


Lech Chacinski is a truck driver who lives in Wierzchowo, Poland with his wife and children. On the morning of August 11, 2003 he left for work at 4:20 am, but as he approached a bridge near Szczecinek he observed three figures (standing in a triangular configuration relative to one-another, one in front and the other two behind) on the road in front of him--the figure in front with his hand raised as if in greeting. As he brought his car to a stop, the trio walked toward him and he at first assumed they were men, dressed in uniforms similar to astronauts' space-suits. However, as they came closer to the driver's side window he realized there was something disturbingly "extraordinary" about them.

Feeling "almost frozen" as the "humanoid" at the apex of the triangular group (called the "leader" by Lech) reached the driver's-side door, Lech could see a darkened helmet with a visor of some "transparent" material, through which he saw two large (3cm diam) round black eyes--but no other facial details. As the full realization of what he was seeing overcame him, Chacinski wanted to drive away immediately--but a blinding "beam of light" shot out from a rectangular chamber on the top of the "leader's" helmet, and Chacinski lost consciousness. When he awakened moments later he felt "calm" and knew the "leader" was telling him telepathically that he didn't have to be scared. He heard the question "Do you hear us?" and mentally responded "yes," after which he was asked to get out of the vehicle, which he reluctantly did.

Lech describes these entities as being about the height of tall humans (approx. 170 cm tall) with a basic human form (2 arms, 2 legs, a torso and a head), wearing tight-fitting, seamless "overalls of a dull silvery, elastic foil" material. He states that these overalls seemed to be "pumped up from the inside" and were "integrated with their shoes and mittens." On their heads were "helmets" with some sort of a band around the forehead which had a light source in the center, and on the top of the helmet there was something that Lech thought was a communication device. He saw no insignia anywhere on their clothing, but on their chests were "colorful blinking [rectangular] boards" with "7 lights in each row," each light a different color. He cannot remember the combination of colors, but states that the lights were "falling down [in a sequence] one by one, like a fountain." They also had packs on their backs which looked like those worn by astronauts or cosmonauts.

During the approximately 15-minute encounter Lech telepathically perceived multiple questions posed to him by these beings: "What material is your vehicle made of?" "How does it work?" "What kind of fuel does it use?" Mr. Chacinski did his best to answer and noted that they expressed surprise upon hearing how his vehicle operated. They also indicated interest in his clothing, in particular his belt and shoes. [This detail is of great interest, in that beings encountered in another Poland contact case (to be presented in a separate report) also showed great interest in that witness's leather belt and shoes.]

The "leader" (who was the only communicator) then stated that they had come to deliver a message to the inhabitants of Earth, and Lech had the impression that he was being charged with the responsibility of spreading this message as widely as possible.

In essence the message was that we must "care" for ourselves and our planet, and that if we continue to disrespect the laws of Nature, the result will be catastrophic. Why this encounter, and this message—apparently regarding the environment--was delivered to Lech, he has no idea. Mr. Chacinski was apparently able to ask only one question of these beings, "Where do you come from?," to which they replied "Eight Galaxy." They also told him they would return, although with no details as to when, where, or for what purpose.

Truly awed by the ongoing encounter, Chacinski next watched as the three beings rose up about 3m into the air and "floated" across the field adjacent to the road to a very solid-looking "metal-like disc" about 300m away (which he had not noticed until this moment). Lech thinks the body of the UFO was about 50m wide (the "legs" being underneath the body of the craft), by about 20m tall. [His drawing ability does not equal a fully accurate representation of the UFO.] There were three rows of individually-colored "windows" across the upper half of the UFO and three sets of 5m long, girder-like legs, each set ending in two separate round feet which apparently stabilized the UFO on the uneven ground near the top of the hill. [Lech is not absolutely certain that these "feet" were actually touching the ground.] On the very top of the UFO was an opaque chamber and two "antennae." The beings landed close to the craft and then walked beneath it, at which point a beam of "very bright blue-white light" shot out from a round hole which opened up on the underside of the ship. This light "took the three beings up into the UFO" and the hole closed, after which a "colored smoke" (or fog) enveloped the craft. The UFO then "floated" over the ground for about 50m, stopped briefly (during which time the "smoke" dissipated), and then flew away at a 70° angle toward the SE, making an "ssssssss" sound.

Once the UFO had departed an imprint of multilple circles could be seen in the field, in which the plants were swirled and flattened--with smaller circles in the same areas relative to the "feet" Chacinski saw beneath the craft.



Andreas Muller has examined the two photos included in the original 4/26/04 report and has provided a "pseudo aerial" (a stretched version), which more clearly shows a thin, eccentric, ring around one of the smaller circles (Right, front) of the photo. He also thinks that this feature may be repeated around the smaller of the Left front set of circles, although this is not certain. And we can see only one circle in the set near the top of the hill.



Based on two newly-obtained photos, below (assuming the man in the center circle to be about 2m tall when standing upright), I measure the center circle to be about 22m (+/-) in diameter. If Mr. Chacinski's estimate of the size of the UFO is correct, the entire crop formation would have been underneath the UFO.

As Mr. Chacinski got back into his car after the UFO departed a man he knew pulled up next to him, asking if he needed help. Saying that "no," he was OK, Lech suddenly realized he had seen no other cars driving by during the entire incident and wondered if the humanoids had somehow caused this. He went on to work, where at first he said nothing about the incident to his colleagues. He did, however, call the police anonymously to report the imprint in the crop and then went home for awhile and told his wife about the experience. They discussed what he should do, in particular regarding the "message" he had received, and Lech reports that he did not want to "tell anything" about his morning's encounter. But that afternoon, back at work, he decided to notify the police again, this time identifying himself and describing the entire event. He then also told his colleagues and others, subsequently enduring ridicule and some "very bad times," with many people laughing at him and making fun of his report.

Lech returned to the crop imprint the following day with his two sons, his daugher and her husband, and walked into the large center circle. After a few minutes inside the circle he again experienced a moment "as bad as when he was blinded by the leader's beam of light," but this time he did not lose consciousness. And for the 3-4 months following his close encounter he noticed that he was unusually "tranquil" and uninterested in quarreling or raising his voice, a change noted also by his wife and friends.

So far as we know this is the first detailed eyewitness report of a "solid body" type UFO and "humanoid" beings being directly associated with the creation of a crop circle. Other eyewitness accounts of aerial light phenomena creating crop formations (see:
www.bltresearch.com/eyewitness1.html
and a combination of light and solid-looking "craft" creating one (see:
www.bltresearch.com/eyewitness2.html ) have been carefully investigated and reliably reported, and other anecdotal reports are surfacing with increasing regularity (see new report just in:
www.kornkreise-forschung.de/textPoliceObservation.htm ).

For me, having now met and spent considerable time with Lech and some of his friends, this witness's report resolves any doubt that a UFO was directly involved in the creation of this crop circle. It also now seems likely to me that UFOs—whatever they may actually be—have a closer association with crop circles generally than I had ever thought.

Does this mean that all crop circles are caused by UFOs? Most crop circle researchers I know don't think so. And if this, then, indicates that there are multiple causative agencies, well, it's beginning to look like any profound comprehension of this bizarre phenomenon may be even more elusive than we at first suspected.



Without the invaluable assistance of these talented translators this report could not have been written. As an American without foreign language skills I am impressed continually by the lanuguage accomplishments of many many Europeans, and we are indebted to them for their interest, skill and dedication.

Postscript….. In Less Hodun's final transcript to me regarding the Chacinski encounter, he included a question he had asked Lech a year or more previously, as well as Lech's answer. As they were sitting together in a café following a symposium in Police, Poland Mr. Hodun asked Lech if he had ever experienced any previous "unusual" situation.

Chacinski's answer was riveting. About two weeks prior to the Szczecinek encounter with the three "humanoids" and the UFO something strange had occurred in his own home. It was around midnight and Lech and his wife were watching TV. Lech's attention was drawn toward what looked like a point of light, about 3 cm in diameter, moving horizontally from left to right along the top edge of the wall near the ceiling. Lech said nothing, but as he watched the point of light he felt himself becoming mesmerized. All of a sudden the point of light dropped down to the height of his head and flew straight at him, going directly into his left eye.

He ran into the bathroom, washed his eyes vigorously with cold water, and then came back into the room. At this point he asked his wife if she had seen anything strange, but she had not (as told to Less Hodun).

Addendum, March 1, 2007: Dr. James Deardorff, now Professor Emeritus in the Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, and a meticulous student of the intensely controversial Billy Meier "contactee" case in Switzerland, has informed me that Meier found similarly-swirled imprints in grasses in conjunction with some of his UFO/humanoid encounters during the 1970s. (See: www.tjresearch.info/BillyYes.htm - about 80% of the way down the page, Figs. 13, 14, 15). See also: www.ltjresearch.info/hasenbol.htm (about 60% down the page, click on "swirled patterns"). One photo (taken from the video "The Meier Chronicles," produced by Lee & Brit Elders) shows a set of 3 circles with counter-clockwise swirls (another set is at the extreme left of the photo) which Meier found after one contact incident. Second photo is a close-up, showing the swirling pattern more clearly.



I have no direct knowledge of the Billy Meier case and, thus, no informed opinion regarding it. But I do know that Dr. Deardorff is a professional, well-educated scientist who has published a considerable volume of work in mainstream peer-reviewed journals during his academic career. My knowledge of other serious scholars indicates that they generally utilize the same skills and training in their evaluation of any subject they study, and so I have to consider this information about the Meier case seriously.
http://tinyurl.com/ywlsg6

Livermore may lead labs in building new H-bomb
First new 'replacement warhead' in 20 years to be announced today
By Ralph Vartabedian, Los Angeles Times
Article Last Updated: 03/02/2007 05:24:17 AM PST

The Energy Department will announce today a contract to develop the nation's first new hydrogen bomb in two decades, involving a collaboration between three national weapons laboratories, the Los Angeles Times has learned.

The new bomb would include design features from all three labs, although Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory appears to have the taken the lead position in the project. Los Alamos and Sandia national labs in New Mexico also will be part of the effort.

Teams of scientists in California and New Mexico have been working since last year to develop the new bomb, using the world's most powerful supercomputers. The bomb is known as the reliable replacement warhead, intended to replace aging warheads currently deployed on missiles aboard Trident submarines.

The contract decision was made by the Nuclear Weapons Council, consisting of officials from the Defense Department and the National Nuclear Security Administration, part of the Energy Department. Plans were under way Thursday to announce the contract award this afternoon. The nuclear administration will issue the contract and run the program.

The development cost is secret, although outside experts said it will cost billions of dollars — perhaps tens of billions — to develop the bomb, build new factories to restart high volume weapons production and then actually assemble the weapons.

If Livermore does become the lead laboratory, it would bolster confidence in the facility and could quell political suggestions that its role in weapons development is unnecessary. If Los Alamos wins the program, it would help extract the lab from deep political problems growing out of security breaches. The program, however, is not expected to create a surge of employment at any labs.

The program would mark the first time that the military would field nuclear weapon design without an underground test. The last time scientists set off a hydrogen bomb was in 1991 under the Nevada desert. President Clinton ordered a moratorium on testing, a decision continued by President Bush.

Because the entire reason for building the new bomb is to maintain confidence in the nation's nuclear deterrent, experts say that the Nuclear Weapons Council would want the most conservative design, giving Livermore the upper hand.

The design details of the new bomb are secret, but Livermore's design used major components that had been tested — but not produced — for a Navy bomb about two decades ago. By contrast, Los Alamos selected a design that involved an atomic trigger and a thermonuclear component that had been separately tested. The two elements were never tested together, said Philip Coyle, who serves on scientific advisory committees and formerly was deputy director at Livermore.

The Los Alamos design was said to contain some highly attractive features, including innovative mechanisms that would prevent terrorists from being able to detonate a bomb should one be stolen, according to experts. Those controls were cited by military officials as a key reason for developing the new weapon.

Proponents of the reliable replacement warhead effort say the nation's existing nuclear stockpile is getting old and that doubts will eventually grow about the reliability of the weapons. They say the new weapon would not have any greater nuclear yield and could not perform any new military missions beyond those of existing weapons.

So far, those arguments have attracted bipartisan support, including from Democrats who have long played a leading role in nuclear weapons issues.

But critics say the existing stockpile is perfectly reliable and that it can be carefully maintained for decades. The new bomb would undermine U.S. efforts to stop nuclear proliferation, they add. Also, a recent scientific report said that plutonium components in the weapon are aging much more slowly than expected.
http://tinyurl.com/ywhhzj

Correction: this could become a crash after all
As traders brace for fresh turmoil, soothing words may simply be hiding reality

Larry Elliott, economics editor
Monday March 5, 2007
The Guardian

With his low opinion poll ratings, George Bush needs a crash on Wall Street like a hole in the head. The days are ticking away towards the end of his presidency and the Pentagon is warning that unless the "surge" in Iraq works the United States could be heading for another Vietnam.

Little wonder, then, that Washington did its best to rubbish any suggestion that last week's turbulence on the financial markets amounted to anything more than a little temporary difficulty. In this, the Bush administration was ably supported by the great and good of New York - or at least that part of the financial elite that wasn't banged up for alleged insider trading last week by the securities and exchange commission. As ever, the same reassuring story was spun. Like a hypnotist faced with a sceptical member of the audience, the words were repeated over and over again. Listen, this is a correction not a crash. Relax, the fundamentals of the global economy are strong. Are you listening to me? There will be no recession in the US. Did you hear what I said? There will be no recession in the US.

By the end of the week, the trick seemed to have paid off. Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Fed, had downplayed the risks of recession brought to the public's attention by his predecessor, Alan Greenspan. And the markets were gagging for reassurance. After all, if you've spent the past couple of years persuading yourself and clients that investing in the current climate is risk-free, the last thing you want to hear is that the glittering edifice of the global economy is a Potemkin village - the fake Crimean settlements set up to impress Catherine II. The dozen charged by the SEC are not the only ones guilty of rigging markets; they were just a bit more self-serving about it, that's all.

Naturally, the consensus may be right. The consensus tends to be right more often than it is wrong, which is why real crashes of the sort seen in October 1929 and October 1987 tend to be a rarity. Indeed, the big sell-off of 20 years ago did prove to be far less of a threat than was initially feared.

Even so, there are reasons for concern. One is that the soothing words were at odds with what happened in the markets. Wall Street suffered its biggest weekly fall in four years with the Dow Jones industrial average down 4.2%.

Banks raised the cost of the dodgy loans in the sub-prime market, and the contagion affected other markets. The cost of insurance against credit defaults rose sharply and there was a flight to quality assets. This may prove temporary; if the self-hypnotism works the financial markets may soon again be seeking out all sorts of rococo investments, amplified by derivatives, in the belief that they are risk-free.

This, in some ways, would be more worrying than a flight to quality or rising spreads on junk bonds, because the riskiest of all markets is the one where the players can see no risk.

A second concern is that the US may be in a lot worse shape than Wall Street - cocooned by its sky-high salaries and lucrative bonuses - realises. One view of the US economy since the early 1990s is a glorious renaissance built on the coming industries of the hi-tech revolution; another is that an unsustainable stock market was followed by a bust, and that in turn was followed by an unsustainable boom in the housing market that has also now gone bust. Sure, the Fed could respond to the threat of recession by cutting interest rates, but the traction gained by cheap money is going to be a lot less this time. Why? For one thing, the two debt-driven bubbles have left consumers enormously over-extended. For another, inflation in the asset markets has spilled over into general inflation. Cutting the cost of borrowing might have more of an impact on prices than it would on activity.

As Stephen Lewis of Insinger de Beaufort puts it, the real surprise, given what has been happening in the US housing market, is that consumer spending has held up so well. But there is a sense that the consumer is starting to run out of road, with spending propped up by the one-off impact of lower energy prices.

Charles Dumas at Lombard Street Research agrees, and says the increase in borrowing on credit cards rather than the rising value of real estate, is a sign that US consumers are drinking in the last-chance saloon. The vast majority of Americans don't have a yacht and a summer home in the Hamptons; they don't have stock options and they have not seen their salaries rise at 10, 50 or 100 times the current inflation rate.

Given Asia's export-dominated growth is heavily weighted towards the US, investors should be prepared for the 9% fall in Shanghai last Tuesday to be the first of many bad days.

"Household borrowing is the centre of the storm," says Dumas. "When economies fluctuate, services fluctuate gently, construction and manufacturing more violently. Construction we know about: the housing slump is now beginning to be reinforced by a business construction collapse. The US manufacturing sector is now called China, or Pacific-developing Asia more generally. The current US downswing must take the gloss off growth in that region, where asset markets are priced for perfection." A different perspective comes from Stephen King at HSBC. His view is that the global economy is now more than the United States and its satellites. Even if America does slide into recession, there is no reason to assume the rest of the world will follow.

This requires a radical re-think, since we have become accustomed, particularly since the collapse of the Soviet Union to assume the world is unipolar with the US the hegemonic power. King says the weaker domestic demand growth in the US last year did not seem to have knock-on effects elsewhere. Far from catching a cold when the US sneezed, the rest of the world went shopping. "Relative to our own forecasts, the big surprise last year was the strength of domestic demand growth, notably in Canada, Mexico, China, the Middle East, Germany and the UK."

On the face of it, this is a relatively reassuring interpretation of events. If there really has been a de-coupling going on under our noses, it is possible that a US recession could be isolated. Scratch beneath the surface, though, and King's thesis has some potentially serious long-term geo-political - and hence economic - consequences. What could be happening is that we are seeing the very gradual waning of US economic supremacy, with years of budget and trade deficits and two decades of excessive consumption chipping away at what is still a phenomenally powerful economy. Britain suffered from just this process in the final quarter of the 19th century; other nations were growing in strength and Britain was in the early stages of relative decline.

Paul Kennedy argued in the late 1980s that political power derives from economic power. The first doubts crept in for Britain when winning the Boer War in the face of determined resistance and guerrilla attacks proved a lot more difficult than London had blithely imagined. History may show that South Africa between 1899 and 1902 is a better parallel for America under Bush than is Vietnam.
http://tinyurl.com/3x645m


US triggers $11bn HSBC fall-out
From The Sunday Times
March 04, 2007

EUROPE’s biggest bank, HSBC, is to write off $11 billion to cover mounting losses in its troubled American offshoot, HSBC Finance Corporation.

Stephen Green and Mike Geoghegan, the bank’s chairman and chief executive, are making the huge provisions — which will be announced alongside tomorrow’s full-year results — in an attempt to draw a line under the bank’s miserable experience since buying the business, then known as Household, for $14 billion (£7.2 billion) four years ago. The duo are under unprecedented pressure from shareholders over ballooning bad debts at its US mortgage business.

HSBC’s US business has faced escalating losses from thousands of low-income families who have been unable to repay loans. But the scale of its write-off, largely linked to the US business, will surprise many investors; they will want to know whether the worst is now over and whether the write-off, technically called an “impairment charge”, covers anticipated losses for this year as well.

The provision is equivalent to a third of last year’s operating profits of $30 billion and half its pretax profits, expected to be just north of $22 billion. This will be the highest-ever profit made by a British-based bank. To put it in context, the write-off is equivalent to the overall profits of £5.7 billion announced by HBOS, Britain’s fourth-largest bank, last week.

HSBC has already replaced its senior North American management team, and Doug Flint, the group’s finance director, and Geoghegan have been charged with putting the operation back on track.

The problems within the division will cast a cloud over the results. But in order to calm the nerves of investors, Green is expected to raise the final dividend by nearly 10%.

The bank is keen to show that the growth in Asia and other emerging countries has compensated for its US problems. Three weeks ago the bank was forced to issue the first profit warning in its 142-year history after a hastily arranged board meeting.

The warning came after the bank discovered that rising problems in the US mortgage business meant that the group’s bad-debt provisions had surged by $1.75 billion — 20% higher than analysts and investors had been forecasting. The bank is understood to have lent about $11 billion in so-called second-lien mortgages — a form of high-risk loan where a bank only has a second claim if a borrower defaults.

The problems have led to a cull of senior executives. Two weeks ago, Bobby Mehta, chief executive of HSBC Finance Corporation (HFC) and also head of the bank’s overall North American operations, resigned. Sandy Derickson, chief executive of HSBC Bank USA, also stepped down. The two were some of the highest-paid executives at HSBC, sharing $40m in performance-related bonuses in 2004 and 2005.

The scale of HFC’s problems started to emerge at the bank’s preclose trading statement in early December.

In a move that shocked the City, HSBC admitted it had seriously underestimated the number of people in America who were defaulting on second home loans in portfolios bought by the bank. What was even more shocking was that many of the loans had been taken out just six months earlier.

The mounting problems have raised questions about HSBC’s decision to buy Household. At the time of the deal, investors were sceptical about the wisdom of HSBC buying a consumer-finance group that specialised in sub-prime lending, or loans to people with patchy credit records.

Although HSBC has claimed it gained huge expertise in handling risky mortgages through the Household deal, the recent profit warning has raised suggestions that its systems and management controls were lacking.

HSBC is also facing huge pressure from shareholders concerned about the problems at HFC and the bank’s woeful share-price performance. Last year, HSBC’s shares were the worst performers of any British bank, falling by 0.2%. Geoghegan has staked his reputation on turning round the problems at HFC, saying “the buck stops at my door”.

Some leading shareholders are also understood to have called on the bank to clarify its succession planning as part of a growing desire for it to look for an external candidate as its next nonexecutive chairman. Traditionally HSBC’s chairman has had an executive role and been promoted from within. Before Green succeeded Sir John Bond as chairman in May, he had been chief executive.

The bank has attempted to strengthen its lineup of nonexecutive directors after facing criticism that too few were independent. It has recently recruited Simon Robertson, formerly president of Goldman Sachs Europe and now chairman of Rolls-Royce.

Last Friday the bank announced that Richard Cousins, now chief executive of Compass, the caterer, is to join the HSBC board as a nonexecutive director.

Shares in HSBC closed the week at 886p — 10p off their low for the past 12 months— valuing the company at £102 billion.
http://tinyurl.com/39h64y
John Waples and Grant Ringshaw

Russia to Counter US Buildup

Moscow, Mar 4 (Prensa Latina) Russia readies to respond the eventual installation of a US anti-Missile Defense system in the Caucasus, said Russian AF Chief, Army Gen. Vladimir Mijailov.

Mijailov countered trough RIA Novosti statements by US Anti-Missiles Agency Director, Gen. Henry Obering, who said it would not be a bad idea to install the radar somewhere in the Caucasus.

He regretted the plans to install US offensive weaponry in Ukraine and other ex Soviet republics but Russia has the S-400 missiles to guarantee anti-air and space safety.

Russian AF Chief of Staff Boris Cheltsov said the technology will be operational next July and it will be supplied to the entire anti-air defense system.

On the Caucasian candidate to install the US radar, the vice president of the Russian Academy for Geopolitical Problems, Ret. Gen. Leonid Ivashov mentioned Azerbaijan and Georgia.

John Rood, US undersecretary of State for International Security, said 15 countries are linked to the US anti-missile system by either hosting key parts or by studying the proposal.

Among them he mentioned Britain, Australia, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Israel, India, Japan, Holland, Taiwan, Ukraine, Poland and Czech Republic.

Russian concern with the buildup near its east and western borders led to its 189 billion dollar worth defense investment.
http://tinyurl.com/yo4b6q

lluminati Bankers Hired Hitler to Start WW2
by Henry Makow Ph.D. — March 2, 2007

The ink wasn't dry on the Versailles Peace Treaty before the Illuminati started work on World War Two by building Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.

Before 1919, Hitler had been a political "gun for hire" who had many Jewish friends and had flirted with both Communism and Socialism. Overnight he became a virulent anti-Communist and anti-Semite. What happened? He had become an intelligence officer. Throughout the 1920's the Reichswehr secretly funded his party and trained his SA "Brownshirts."

I suspect General Kurt Von Schleicher was the point man for Illuminati bankers like Max Warburg, whose Frankfurt I.G. Farben HQ was spared by Allied bombers, and whose Jewish mother lived in comfort in Hamburg throughout the war.

In the Protocols of Zion, the author, an Illuminati banker, boasts they create or sanction anti-Semitism when it serves their purpose. "Anti-Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren...this matter has been the subject of repeated discussions amongst us." (Protocol 9). Hitler is an example of how anti-Semitism was created. The author continues:

"It is from us that the all engulfing terror proceeds. We have in our service persons of all opinions, of all doctrines, monarchists, demagogues, socialists, communists and utopian dreamers of every kind...striving to overthrow all established forms of order. All states are in torture... but we will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international Super government..."

There, in black and white, is the Blueprint behind the UN, the EU and NAU, and every war until today. But the bankers have made us think it "racist" to pay heed. As if more than 1% of Jews were/are a conscious part of their heinous, diabolical conspiracy.

Modern history consists of this long-term plan to foment needless wars in order to enslave mankind by destroying nation, religion, race and family. Most historians are paid to obscure this horrible fact: The people ultimately responsible for Auschwitz and the Gulag, Hiroshima and Verdun, still run the world. They are responsible for 9-11 and Iraq.

Our leaders are chosen by their ability to lie and follow orders. Conflicts are charades between antagonists who actually serve the same masters.

(For newcomers, the Illuminati consist of selected members of dynastic Jewish central banking families intermarried with Euro-American aristocracy, as well as Jesuits, who have reached the highest degrees of Kabalistic Freemasonry.)

VERSAILLES

Dr. E. J. Dillon of the London Daily Telegraph wrote in his book The Inside Story of the Peace Conference, (1920): Many delegates deduced that "henceforth the world will be governed by the Anglo-Saxon people, who in turn are swayed by their Jewish elements..." (i.e. the central bankers and their factotums) p 497.

Germany was the major obstacle to using England and the U.S. to impose Illuminati rule upon the world. Thus, onerous reparations were imposed to prompt another much more devastating world war.

Hitler didn’t come to power until 1933 but Germany started rearming in 1919 in contravention of Versailles provisions. The Allies turned a blind eye to a massive program that saw Communist and German soldiers train with the latest weaponry in Russia, including whole bases devoted to air force, armor and chemical warfare. When Hitler came to power in 1933, Germany already had an advanced air force.

Another way to evade Versailles was for the Reichswehr to fund and train paramilitary organizations like the Nazi SA which later could be incorporated into the regular army. General Kurt Von Schleicher and Captains Karl Mayr and Ernst Roehm were in charge of this "Black Werhmacht" program.

Sefton Delmer, who was the Daily Express correspondent in Berlin, describes all this in his autobiography "Trail Sinister" (1961). He cites documents showing that Hitler was "acting under Mayr's orders when he joined the tiny German Workers Party and began to build it up..." (64) Delmer says Mayr also funded mass meetings and pamphlets in which Hitler railed against the Jews. "This anti-Jewish campaign ...was being promoted by no less a power than the Staff Officers of the Reichswehr."
(63)

The Reichwehr's purpose was to create popular political support for WW2. According to Delmer, "Schleicher paid out no less than two million pounds from the Reichswehr's secret funds for the Nazi storm troopers..." (120) They were also funded by Illuminati industrialists and bankers.

(Born and raised in Berlin, Sefton Delmer knew Hitler personally, and had a wide range of confidential sources. During the war, he took charge of British "black propaganda" running a range of radio stations aimed at German soldiers.)

HITLER, "ANTI-COMMUNIST, ANTI-SEMITE"

Communism, Nazism and Zionism are triplets, movements conceived and nurtured by the Illuminati to dupe and manipulate humanity.

In his book "The Hidden Hitler" Lothar Machtan, a Professor of Historyat Bremen University says Hitler almost joined the Communists in 1918. He demanded a senior party post that would have exempted him from work but was refused. "Hitler did not set foot in the extreme right wing camp until he had been rejected by left wing groups," Machtan writes. (71)

This book asserts that Hitler was an active homosexual with a thick police file of molestation complaints both in Vienna and Munich.

According to Ian Kershaw, Hitler took part in pro Socialist and Communist demonstrations in 1918-1919 and served as a Socialist Soldiers' Council representative. ("Hitler: 1889-1936 Hubris," p 118-120.)

According to Brigitte Hamann, Hitler's best friends in pre-war Vienna were Jewish. He benefited from Jewish charities and hospitality. Jews bought most of his artwork. For this reason, real anti-Semites shunned him. ("Hitler's Vienna: A Dictator's Apprenticeship," pp.347-352)

Hamann suggests that Hitler's ideas of Aryan racial purity and superiority were based on the Jews. She quotes Hitler:

"Through Moses the Jewish people received a rule for life and living one's life that was elevated to a religion which was entirely tailored toward the essence of one's race, and simply and clearly without dogmas and dubious rules of faith...contains what served the ...well being of one's people, nothing toward consideration of others." (351)

CONCLUSION

Currently there is nostalgia for Hitler based on the belief that he resisted the New World Order. In fact, he was created by the Illuminati to start another war. It is possible that he broke with them at some point. On the other hand, he may have deliberately sabotaged the Nazi cause by not promising to liberate the people under Communist yoke.

Similarly, Hitler's crusade against ordinary Jews was gratuitous and self-defeating, costing Germany international support and the atomic bomb. The anti-Semitic campaign seems tailored by the Illuminati to create racial strife and traumatize Jews into advancing the Zionist agenda. The intermarriage rate in Germany was 60%. In another generation German Jews would have been of little value as Illuminati pawns.

People pin their hopes on leaders like Putin and Ahmadinejad but like Hitler, they were obscure figures who were raised to power by an unseen hand. We don't have real political (or cultural) leaders, just Illuminati pawns.

Human history is always the same: A minority wants to monopolize all power and wealth, at the expense of the many.

Mass serial killers are in charge. No matter how they make nice, they will always revert to form. Iraq and 9-11 are examples.

If only they could devote their energy to good instead of evil, the world would be full of its natural joy.

See also Ted Lang "The Hitler Project"
Anthony Sutton "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler"
and my "Was Hitler an Illuminati Agent?"
http://tinyurl.com/2xs9t4

Hillary Clinton calls Iran a threat to U.S., Israel
The Associated Press
Published: February 1, 2007

NEW YORK: Calling Iran a danger to the U.S. and one of Israel's greatest threats, U.S. senator and presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said "no option can be taken off the table" when dealing with that nation.

"U.S. policy must be clear and unequivocal: We cannot, we should not, we must not permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons," the Democrat told a crowd of Israel supporters. "In dealing with this threat ... no option can be taken off the table."

Clinton spoke at a Manhattan dinner held by the largest pro-Israel lobbying group in the U.S., the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Some 1,700 supporters applauded as she cited her efforts on behalf of the Jewish state and spoke scathingly of Iran's decision to hold a conference last month that questioned whether the Holocaust took place.

"To deny the Holocaust places Iran's leadership in company with the most despicable bigots and historical revisionists," Clinton said, criticizing what she called the Iranian administration's "pro-terrorist, anti-American, anti-Israeli rhetoric."

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has repeatedly called the Holocaust a "myth" and said Israel should be "wiped off the map" and its Jews returned to Europe.

Iran insists its nuclear program is designed to produce energy, not weapons. Ahmadinejad said Thursday his government is determined to continue with its nuclear program, despite U.N. Security Council sanctions imposed over its refusal to halt uranium enrichment, a process that can produce fuel to generate electricity or for the fissile core of an atomic bomb.

Clinton, the front-runner for her party's presidential nomination, called for dialogue with foes of the United States, saying Iran "uses its influence and its revenues in the region to support terrorist elements."

"We need to use every tool at our disposal, including diplomatic and economic in addition to the threat and use of military force," she said.
http://tinyurl.com/3x5332