fufor's unregelmässige news

Afraid? You Should Be.
Fri. June 1, 2007

You Are Dead People Walking.

Or at least that's what my friend DBD and I have concluded. We Are Expendable At Any Time in the Cause of National Security Is A Known Fact. Agent Orange, Operation Northwoods, USS Liberty, Pear Harbor, Waco, Ruby Ridge, Radiation, War, Prisons, Torture, Revolutionary Governmental Overthrowals, Swat Teams, Tasers, Taxes and the Bilderberg Federal Reserve.

The World is Ruled by Elitists in Most Nations. Anyone in virtually any nation can be sacrificed for National Security. People are taken off the street and transported world wide to be tortured. Death 'en masse' for the People for the tyrants whims during War.

Out of the States? Canada, Mexico, Africa, Asia, Russia, Australia The elitists death squads (CIA, the Ms (5, 6) Mossads, KGBs, etc.), etc) know nothing of national borders. It's almost universal an individual may be sacrificed 'en masse' for National Security. National Security has taken on a Broad Spectrum of illegally seized governmental powers.

Stateside? See first paragraph. National Security covers T-shirts, Race, Suspicious Activity, Religion, Cover Ups, Property Thefts, Corruption, Illegal Taxes, Illegal Illegal Wars, Violent Crimes, Corporate rights, the destruction of Family Rights and the Environment. The Constitution does not allow any of this. The Constitution does not allow any corporation to have more rights than an Individual Person. The Constitution does not allow any group to have more rights than an Individual Person.

If we are dead People, you are dead People unless we revert back to the Values, Intent, Laws and Rights of The Consitution. The Constitution is the foundational basis of this Nation. Those that deny The Constitution are Not Citizens of the United States of America. A supposed representative of the People that denies The Constutition and acts against it is guilty of Treason and at the very least, needs to be fired, stripped of their pensions, extraordinary protections and shunned.

All representatives of the People swear an Oath to Support The Constitution. The Only Question I need ask and potential representative of the People is: "If elected do you swear to uphold The Constitution of the United States under penalty of treason." If they don't answer "Yes.", I don't need to know any more.

James Madison states exactly what "the Constitution" means: "The Constitution" means the Historical Background Iterpretated Constitution (HBC). Our Founding Fathers state: 'those that commit Treason against US, require War Levied against Them' (aka: "the elitists"). The US is at War. A War that has been levied against US based on known Fabricated Lies. During War, any of our so-called representatives that are not adhering to their Oaths of Office by demanding legislature consistent with the Historical Background Constitution and Only the Historical Background Constitution is guilty of Treason and guilty until proven innocent - just like they treat US. - is Fired, Pensionless and Forfeit of Illgotten Property (at the very least) - (just like they do to US for having one of God's/Natures plants). Giving Aid and Comfort to Treason is Treason. Every so called representative of the People and the HBC that is not demanding impeachment for a Fabricated War Levied against US, is Guilty of Treason and need to be Impeached, Fired, Pensionless, Forfeit and Shunned. Impeach them all until they adhere to the Historical Background Constitution.

Is Treason a Pension and Property Loss Offense?

Last I heard we are still in an Undeclared State of War based on Fabricated Lies. Our Constitutional Rights have been dismissed as was the "... goddamned piece of paper", the Constitution. The War on Terror is what our Elitist Representatives told The People, so US must be at War.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law. Article 1, Section 3: http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html

Article 1, Section 2: "The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment." Article 1, Section 2: http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html

The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation.

"Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government." --- James Madison. http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/09/10/ward.htm

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Declare Constitutional War - they can't because this War is unConstitutional - or give US back Our Youth/Rights, or prepare to be Fired, Pensionless, Forfeit and Shunned.
Ideas Are Bullet Proof.
http://tinyurl.com/ypffkm

World Exclusive: First Definitive Conclusions of Bilderberg 2007
Daniel Estulin
Saturday June 2, 2007

Related: Exclusive - Bilderbergers War Over World Bank

Well, we have our first conclusions of Bilderberg 2007. Robert Zoellick and the World Bank nomination

The US delegation is standing unanimously behind Robert Zoellick´s candidacy as the next President of the World Bank. Zoellick is a 53 year old Wall Street executive, former administration official and a free-market fundamentalist. During the meeting he pledged “to work to restore confidence in the bank.”

“We need to put our differences aside and focus on the future together. I believe that the World Bank's best days are still to come,” Zoellick said.

The chances of Zoellick not being approved for the chair of World Bank Presidency are slim to none. The final decision is to be made by the end of June by the bank's 24-member board of directors.

The United States and Europe have a tacit agreement between them that the bank's president should always be a US national while its sister institution, the International Monetary Fund, is headed by a European.

Nevertheless, according to our sources at the conference, European Bilderbergers are not at all pleased with continuing the status quo, in which the US nominates a single candidate after informal consultations with bank members.

The nomination also appears to short-circuit burgeoning calls for reform of this selection process at the bank, one of the cornerstones of the global financial architecture as designed by the victors of World War II.

One Belgian Bilderberger proposed “a merit-based selection process, without regard to nationality,” something which will obviously be discarded by the inept Bush administration. What is rather quite remarkable is that on several occasions European Bilderbergers have openly rejected the current model saying “the nomination reeks of double standards,” especially because both the US and the World Bank preach accountability and transparency to developing countries, the main clients of the bank.

But with IMF under the control of a Spaniard, Rodrigo Rato, European central bank, a Frenchman, Jean Claude Trichet, it was a difficult undertaking to imagine that the USA would give up control of the World Bank. Only the US Federal Reserve would remain in the hands of the Americans.

“Replacing one Bush appointee with another will not resolve the fundamental governance problems of the World Bank,” said one Scandinavian. “Member governments should reject a back-door deal that leaves the bank's governance structure intact, and should press for an open, merit-based selection process,” he said.

Zoellick's name also raised eyebrows among development groups for his close ties to the US establishment and corporate interests.

One of the attendees, I have not had the confirmation as to who this individual is, asked Zoellick how he was planning to patch up relationships with third and forth world nations when he is best remembered during his tenure as the USTR, for arm-twisting poor nations' governments to adhere to US-imposed intellectual-property laws that make medicines, for example, unaffordable to the developing world?

He has been a close friend to the brand-name pharmaceutical industry, and the bilateral trade agreements he has negotiated effectively block access to generic medication for millions of people.

However, what has really riled up both the US and European delegates is the fact that World Bank´s dirty linen is being washed in public, thanks in great part to Paul Wolfowitz´s ineptness which incidentally he has blamed on the press.

What is IMF and the World Bank?

It is widely, but mistakenly, believed that the purpose of the World Bank [controlled by the U.S. Federal Reserve] and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) [of which the U.S. is the principal donor and the only nation with the veto power] is to “encourage development and relieve poverty in the third world, but in practice these organizations have added to the impoverishment and destitution of millions” through the loans scheme called "Structural Adjustment Programmes" (SAPs) that have succeeded in adding to the country´s burden of debt and stagnation.
The obvious result of the SAPs from the World Bank and the IMF is that the money lent to the destitute nations were used to make immediate interest payments to western banking institutions, something that both Jim Tucker and I have been saying for years. Furthermore, by ordering Third World economies to focus on production for export purposes, the World Bank and the IMF channelled $178 billion of the Third World financial resources between 1984 and 1990 into servicing dollar-denominated foreign debt.

These programs are being implemented in over 70 Third World and Eastern European countries from Nigeria to Jamaica, from Hungury to Ethiopia, Lesotho, Kenia, Ghana, Uganda subjected to 566 IMF and World Bank stabilization and SAPs with devastating results. SAPs involve the liberalization of African economies which means that foreign companies are encouraged to take over designated sectors of the economy.

The World Bank's own study titled, "Adjustment Lending: An Evaluation of Ten Years of Experience" (1988) has demonstrated that the SAPs undertaken by 15 Sub-Saharan African countries failed utterly in every measurable criteria.

Despite global adjustment, “thirty-six of Africa's 47 countries, according to the bank´s secret study, have been subjected to structural adjustment by the Fund and Bank, yet the total external debt of the continent is now 110 percent of its gross national product.”

Additionally, African states, unable to compete with Western multinationals, have been forced to withdraw from the health sector as part of free market economy. This has put African children at the mercy of unscrupulous international organizations and pharmaceutical transnational corporations, who are thus at liberty to use them as guinea pigs for testing various drugs and vaccines. As a case in point, in January 2001, the U.S.-based pharmaceutical TNC Pfizer used an experimental drug on 50,000 children suffering from meningitis in Kano, Nigeria without official authorization. As a result of the epidemic, 15,000 people died while many others became deaf and blind.

Just a couple of other items on the agenda we are working on to expose as well: European relations with Russia not only in Europe but also in Central Asia. With Moscow making a deal with Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan over the transport of gas to Europe, the US geo-strategic goal of driving a wedge between the Central Asian countries and Russia lies in shambles. While the US says this is "not good for Europe", the Europeans are divided. Iran, overnight has become America’s last hope in the energy war.

Iran war, after two years of huffing and puffing by the Bush government is definitely off the table. Furthermore, with France, Russia, Japan and China investing heavily in Iran, the world has drawn a line in the sand and the U.S. will be told at the conference not to cross it. There is blood in the water, and blood in the water usually leads to a good fight.
That notwithstanding, the United States needs to control the region, not only for its oil reserves but, most importantly to help it sustain world economic hegemony. Under this strategic design, regional states will be turned to weak domains of sectarian sheikhs with little or no sovereignty and, by implications, a pathetic agenda of their economic development. Regional chaos favours the spread of Islamic fundamentalism, which in turn reinforces the process of political and social disintegration supported by the Bilderbergers.

And finally, with Blair leaving, the UK will be told yet again, that they must, at all cost, do what is necessary to integrate the country into the European Community, even against the expressed wishes of Britain´s citizens.

More breaking stories on the Bilderberg Conference as they become available.
http://tinyurl.com/2k8jhx

Exclusive: Bilderbergers War Over World Bank
Reporters detail Elite Confab
Steve Watson & Paul Watson
Infowars.net
Friday, June 1, 2007

Alex Jones was joined on air today by several reporters, including veteran Jim Tucker, reporting exclusively from the Bilderberg conference in Istanbul, Turkey where the shadowy and private meeting of elites from throughout the Western world is now underway.

Yesterday Tucker exclusively revealed that the meeting is to be held at the Ritz Carlton in Istanbul after the group tried to throw the local media off the scent and lie in claiming the elite confab was to take place 40 miles away in the city of Silivri.

It seems that Bilderberg has also been using the Turkish media, in particular the Turkish Daily News as a propaganda mouthpiece, having it pen an article today entitled 'Why are we scared of Bilderberg?'

Tucker became convinced the Carlton was the real site when security surrounding the area became intense yesterday.



Tucker described a heavy police presence surrounding the Ritz Carlton and confirmed that he had been followed by secret police and was under close surveillance. The police have put up large metal barriers around the hotel making sure no one gets close, as can be seen in the picture above.

According to Romanian journalist Paul Dorneanu, who is covering the meeting and also briefly joined Alex Jones on air today there are upwards of 100 protesters in the vicinity of the Ritz Carlton.

Early reports suggest that activities are already underway with long time Bilderberger Henry Kissinger having already called for a new international cooperation in order to end the civil war in Iraq.

Kissinger revealed why Istanbul has been chosen this year stating “Turkey is in a position to make an important contribution for shaping what I mentioned above,” saying that Turkey's being part of the European system has an extremely strategic importance.

Jim Tucker suggested that Bilderberg is keen to portray Turkey as desperate to be allowed entry the to EU despite the fact that many Turks are strongly opposed to it because they see it as a surrendering of sovereignty.

Also joining Jones on air was Daniel Estulin who has been covering the Bilderberg group for 15 years.

Estulin pointed to the fact that a Bilderberg attendee, Robert Zoellick is the US candidate to take over at the World Bank. Estulin revealed that his sources have told him that yesterday Zoellick pledged to Bilderberg that he will restore confidence in the World Bank and that differences need to be put aside in order that the global body can be strengthened.

According to Estulin's sources however, European Bilderbergers are not at all happy with continuing the status Quo of having the US nominated candidate become the world bank President. Estulin says that one Belgian Bilderberger proposed a merit based selection process without regard to nationality, fearing that if the world bank goes with Zoellick it could be accused of double standards because he is best remembered for arm twisting poor nations to adhere to US imposed intellectual property laws that make medicines and drugs unaffordable to the developing world.

This reveals exactly why Zoellick has been nominated to head up the world bank, he has a great track record during his time as a trade representative and NAFTA architect of securing globalist dominance over the third world. Zoellick is, as we revealed here yesterday, a globalist all rounder with strong corporate ties to boot. As it preaches accountability and transparency to developing nations, some elites at the Bilderberg meeting clearly fear Zoellick's appointment would be compromising.

Estulin went on to describe in depth the damage that the world bank and its sister globalist outfit the IMF have done to humanity through their "Structural adjustment programs" which are nothing more than huge loans handed out to third world nations in order to reap the profits from the resulting debt trap.

Returning to the media coverage of Bilderberg, the Dallas Morning News yesterday reported Texas Governor Rick Perry's attendance at this year's Bilderberg meeting which has since been confirmed by the Governor's Press Office as he left Austin for Istanbul and also picked up by the AP.

Perry has been intimately involved in aiding international firms represented by Bilderberg personnel to take control over land, roads and newly privatized utilities in Texas.

Jim Tucker believes that Bilderberg are considering him as a potential future President because he is not a regular attendee. If he is invited back next year this may be an indication that he is in the running for future leadership, according to Tucker.

Appearing on the Alex jones show yesterday, presidential candidate Ron Paul confirmed that Perry's trip could be in violation of the Logan Act which prevents U.S. citizens from unauthorized negotiations with foreign entities. Paul also added that the trip indicates Perry is in league with the movement to establish a global government.

Listen to today's Bilderberg exclusive here: http://tinyurl.com/yq8x4r
http://tinyurl.com/2zej76

An Interview with Dr. McKay
Victoria Hardy
May 18, 2007

I’ve been writing a lot about perception these days and how folks can see the same event and walk away with totally different views; it’s a subject I find fascinating. And with that in mind, I turn back to the chemtrail/contrail battle raging even stronger on the Internet. It seems the lines are firmly drawn between the factions. Those who see contrails believe the chemtrail seers are kooks and those who see chemtrails believe the contrail seers are asleep and in denial. Besides the emails I have received concerning illnesses, respiratory issues and nose bleeds, I’ve had others speak of a sense of oddness, a lack of concentration and strange dreams after seeing heavy trails in the sky. I don’t know if they are contrails or chemtrails or if what we call them even matters, what I do know is that my gut spoke with a resounding “That ain’t right,” the first time I saw one. I’m a bit of a simpleton when it comes to the world; I tend to trust my own eyes, logic, experience and instincts over the words of the experts. And the majority of the experts agree that the lines in the sky are simply contrails, just like a majority of experts agree that it is normal for steel buildings to collapse in free fall speed due to fire.

Luckily for us there are those experts who stand up for the truth, who buck the trend and who carve new paths. Dr. McKay and I have been playing email tag for months now, so I ended up receiving his conclusions on the chemtrail phenomenon before I received the answers to an interview I sent him back in February. Although I believe his findings answered most questions in A Doctor Speaks Out About Chemtrails, I would like share some excerpts from the earlier interview.

Q. You stated your interest in chemtrails came from a geo-engineering view and correct me if I'm wrong, but geo-engineering breaks down to mean earth engineering, so the chemtrails are being used to alter the earth?

A. Yes, the earth as a whole. It is the atmosphere that is being altered by various means of modification.

Q. Would that include earthquakes?

A. No. There is no link to earthquakes from chemtrails, however HAARP is a suspect.

Q. Would it also include melting the Polar Regions?

A. Yes. The simple fact that they are releasing these chemicals and using other means to steer the weather systems is enough to alter the natural stability of the Polar Regions.

Q. Is it as meteorologist Scott Stevens at WeatherWars.info has stated, that now that is has started, it cannot be stopped?

A. Yes, unfortunately it is a case of a small domino effect, or in this case it is more like the butterfly effect. i.e. if a butterfly flaps its wings in one country it may cause a gale in another country.

Q. I understand that HAARP and radio frequency work together with the chemtrails, and I understand that the use of metals in the air increases our communication and surveillance abilities, but could you address the affect on our state of being, our moods and our health?

A. The major concerns for our health are not just the effects of the trails (heavy metals) but also the effects of radio frequency, the frequency that the likes of HAARP use are very close to the bodies’ natural frequencies so they are bound to affect our health. Both Alzheimer’s and MS have links with heavy metals so if the increase in heavy metals continues then the rates of these conditions will also increase over time.

Q. I have read that the Schumann's Resonance, or the natural frequency or heartbeat of the earth has altered in recent years and that the magnetic field is at it lowest point in 2000 years, are these changes a natural evolution or a result of "chemtrails"? And any ideas of how this affects the planet and its people?

A. Yes, it has altered but it is probably the result of all the electric fields that we humans have introduced to the earth, Power lines, and it is increasing, NOT lowering. It alters the waves the body responds to for example: Gamma, Beta, Alpha, Theta and Delta waves. The brain responds to inputs at a certain frequency or frequencies. Instabilities in certain rhythms can be correlated with tics, obsessive-compulsive disorder, aggressive behavior, rage, panic attacks, bipolar disorder, migraines, narcolepsy, epilepsy, sleep apnea, vertigo, tinnitus, anorexia/bulimia, suicidal ideation and behavior, PMS, multiple chemical sensitivities, diabetes, hypoglycemia and explosive behavior.

The strongest of the seven resonances is 7.83 Hz, in the alpha brain-wave range. If the rise in resonance continues, this primary resonance, changes from sub-band low alpha (7-10 Hz) to sub-band high alpha (10-12 Hz), perhaps influencing our ability to relax deeply, balance and integrate our mind/body connection. It could influence REM sleep and dreaming. If it continues to rise, it will breach the threshold into beta activity. Low beta (12-15 Hz) is associated with lack of focused attention, and can even indicate attention deficit disorder.

Q. I have heard that HAARP is literally extending or "pushing out" our ionosphere, how would that affect the magnetic field?

A. HAARP is very worrying as it is directly heating the sphere and pushing it outwards.

The sphere is linked to the earth’s own magnetic field and affecting it would be very bad for the earth as it would alter most living things. For example there are recent reports from around the world of Birds, Bees and marine animals suddenly dying in large numbers, all of these creatures use the earths magnetic fields and it is no surprise that an increase in HAARP activity has coincided with an increase in abnormal behavior

Q. How are chemtrails affecting the global warming issue?

A. Chemtrails are being used to wrap the earth in a blanket to supposedly help the earth with global warming and to block the rays of the sun from hitting the earth including the ultra violet radiation that will come through without an adequate layer of ozone in the upper regions above the earth. This, it is hoped, will lower temperature on the surface of the earth and block ultra violet radiation from causing skin cancer in humans, however there is now evidence that it may actually harm the planet in the respect that it traps the heat in.

Q. And what about the orbs that are being seen in and along chemtrails, I had only seen pictures and read stories of such orbs until 1-27-07, when I saw one myself. Are they using some type of top-secret propulsion system?

A. I have come to the conclusion that orbs are a very hi-tech probe, powered by a new form of propulsion, there is strong evidence for this, for example they are always seen around spraying, there are examples of new technology unveiled recently that are round probes that can stay aloft for hours and hours.

Q. Could all the recent sightings of strange lights in the skies and UFOs have something to do with top-secret propulsion systems and chemtrails?

A. It is possible that it is tied in, as one of the goals of the DOD is to create projections into the sky, also there is a possibility that they are side effects of atmosphere testing of new radar technology.

Q. To the best of my knowledge, from the videos and photos I've seen and all the websites dedicated to the subject, this appears to be happening on a global basis, how has it stayed so quiet?

A. Well, the problem is that it is such a big project, involving so many countries and many states, and there is a lot at stake so people tend to keep quiet.

Q. And the thought that keeps me up at night, why isn't everyone on the street pointing up and asking questions?

A. Unfortunately, history shows us that the general population tends not to notice something until its too late, even when people are shown it, they will often still deny it, as it is better to deny it than accept the true horror of the truth.
http://tinyurl.com/28as99