Bush, Clintons, neocons et al. are enemy agents of China's/Israel's secret war on US
Bush, Clintons, neocons et al. are enemy agents of China's/Israel's secret war on US : Paul Craig Roberts wrong about the true secret reason for war with Iraq
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 21:22:26 -0700
All strategic positions in the US have been infiltrated by infinitely corrupt and murderous ruling elites -- the Triad princelings ruling China, the Zionist merchant banking families, the network of organized crime working through freemasonry and other secret socities. 9-11 was a joint Chinese-Israeli-Private operation involving the infiltration of the US and UK with agents bent on the subversion and destruction of the US. These people represent the long line of powers comprising the "old world order" that the American Revolution of 1776 was fought to free people from.
But from the beginning of the US Constitution and the first political "boss" Alexander Hamilton the old order has sought to regain its control through subversion -- especially through the control of the money system.
I have no doubt that the next president (unless it is Ron Paul) will work to continue the destruction of the American people, their consititution, their way of life which the soi-disant global aristocracy begruges us.
The Chinese dictators know that their will never be secure as long as the idea of freedom remains in the world. The Zionist merchant bankers know that as long as the American middle-class exists -- people who know too much about the money power's profiting role in the world's great wars, revolutions and economic calamities -- they cannot be secure in their domination of the world. And so they both mean to kill us -- after first destroying us economically (look around you) and militarily (urban warfare by our soldiers against all Islam -- and infiltration of our military command by secretly anti-American agents of Israel) and psychologically (check the media) -- so that our conquest, mass murder (the way the Iraqi intelligencia are being murdered by Mossad hit men) and flooding of the by a Babel of ignorant foreigners (most Mexicans in the US are simply stupid led-by-the-nose Marxists in their opposition to globalism if they have any political awareness at all -- absolutely no idea of who Jefferson was or how he differs from Bush-Clinton -- much less who Ron Paul is and what he stands for.
This is the one reality I've been waking up to every morning. I've known if for years. I get worn out saying it. How often should I say it? I know I have not said it enough. Let me say it again: Both political parties are pushing candidates who are part of an ongoing plot of subversion -- their goal is to overthrow the American people and the type of goverment they believe in -- believe in but have not enjoyed since the 1920's and a little bit in the late 1940's up to the election of Eisenhower and the fall of Joe McCarthy (who was right about everything , as it turns out)
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
-----------------------------------------------
The Real Reason for Bush's Invasion of Iraq is a National Security Secret
By Paul Craig Roberts
American soldiers have been fighting and dying in Iraq since 2003, and Americans do not know why.
All the reasons President Bush gave us for his war are false. Bush said he invaded Iraq "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people."
We now know that these were false claims. Disinformation about Iraq was produced by a special unit within the Pentagon run by Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Feith. The unit operated outside the normal intelligence channels of the CIA and DIA. Its purpose was to create false intelligence to enable Bush to initiate war with Iraq.
Did President Bush know that the claims put into his speeches by his speechwriters was false?
Who instructed Bush's speechwriters to incorporate known lies into the President's speeches?
Why did Vice President Cheney, the Secretary of State, the National Security Advisor, and the Secretary of Defense all lie to the American people and to the entire world?
What is the real agenda?
Millions of Americans have come to their own conclusions about the reasons for Bush's invasion:
(1) Oil: the US government wants to hold on to power by expanding its control over oil, and Bush and Cheney want to reward their oil company cronies.
(2) Military-security complex: Police agencies favor war as a means of expanding their power, and military industries favor war as a means of expanding their profits.
(3) Neoconservative ideology: Neocons' believe in "American exceptionalism" and claim that America's virtue gives the US government the right and the obligation to impose US hegemony on the rest of the world, especially in the Middle East where independent Muslim states object to Israel's theft of Palestine.
(4) Karl Rove: Rove used the "war president" role to rescue Bush from attack by Democrats as an illegitimate president elected by one vote of the US Supreme Court.
(5) American self-righteousness over 9/11 and lust for revenge.
All of these reasons came together to make a cruel war on an innocent people.
There may be other reasons about which we know not.
As it is now recognized that every reason for the war is false or illegitimate, the question is: why does Bush insist on persisting with a costly war, the express reasons for which are now known to be mistakes? There were no weapons of mass destruction, no connections to al Qaeda, and Bush has installed a puppet Iraqi government that cannot venture outside the heavily fortified and US protected "green zone." The Iraqi government governs nothing.
War without cause is murder, not war.
That Bush persists with a war for which he can provide no legitimate reason indicates that there is a secret agenda that has not been shared with the American people. Are we experiencing the privatization of the US government by police agencies, the military-security complex, and the Israel Lobby?
That the American people and their elected representatives continue to tolerate a war that has killed and maimed thousands of their own soldiers, destroyed the infrastructure of a country,
killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians and created 4 million refugees for no known reason raises serious questions about the morals of the American people.
Is the impotence of the peace movement due to the power of the Israel Lobby or have Americans become morally degenerate as commentators increasingly assert?
One indication would be the response of presidential candidates to the gratuitous and failed war. What we saw at the Republican presidential candidates' debate on June 5 is inconsistent with the self-esteem of the American people. All of the leading Republican presidential candidates openly and nonchalantly endorsed using nuclear weapons against Iran unless Iran abandons its right to enrich uranium under the non-proliferation treaty, to which Iran is a signatory (unlike nuclear-armed Israel, India, and US puppet Pakistan).
What is moral degeneracy if it is not using nuclear weapons to murder masses of innocent civilians and spread deadly radioactivity over vast areas merely in order to force a country to do as we order? If this isn't barbarism, what is barbarism?
Do the American people realize that the frontrunners for the Republican presidential nomination are monsters who want to murder people who have done us no harm?
After five years of war that has achieved no noble purpose, no valid aim, indeed, no aim at all except perhaps Osama bin Laden's aim of stirring up uncontrollable strife in the Middle East, how can Republicans cheer for candidates who preach a wider war and the use of nuclear weapons against defenseless people?
Is the approval lavished on Republican presidential candidates, who are willing to use nuclear weapons as means of terrorizing Muslim peoples, an indication that the American people have morphed into inhuman monsters?
If not, what does it indicate? Ignorant fanaticism? Paranoia? Blind hatred? The belief that no one is of any value but Americans?
For six and one-half years the Bush Regime has relied on coercion, intimidation, war, and threats of war. Diplomacy and good will have been shunned. The regime's blatant warmongering has resurrected the nuclear arms race. China and Russia regard America's drive for world hegemony with great alarm. China has put nuclear ICBMs on mobile platforms to increase their survivability in event of an American attack. Russia has developed new multi-warhead ICBMs, which can penetrate any known missile defense, and new cruise missiles that Putin says will be targeted on Europe if the US persists in its aggressive military encirclement of Russia.
An administration that resurrects the threat of nuclear Armageddon so that its cronies in the military-security complex can become still richer is evil beyond compare.
Paul Craig Roberts wrote the Kemp-Roth bill and was assistant secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was associate editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and contributing editor of National Review. He is author or co-author of eight books, including The Supply-Side Revolution (Harvard University Press). He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon chair in political economy, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and senior research fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He has contributed to numerous scholarly journals and testified before Congress on 30 occasions. He has been awarded the U.S. Treasury's Meritorious Service Award and the French Legion of Honor. He was a reviewer for the Journal of Political Economy under editor Robert Mundell
(yahoo.group)
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 21:22:26 -0700
All strategic positions in the US have been infiltrated by infinitely corrupt and murderous ruling elites -- the Triad princelings ruling China, the Zionist merchant banking families, the network of organized crime working through freemasonry and other secret socities. 9-11 was a joint Chinese-Israeli-Private operation involving the infiltration of the US and UK with agents bent on the subversion and destruction of the US. These people represent the long line of powers comprising the "old world order" that the American Revolution of 1776 was fought to free people from.
But from the beginning of the US Constitution and the first political "boss" Alexander Hamilton the old order has sought to regain its control through subversion -- especially through the control of the money system.
I have no doubt that the next president (unless it is Ron Paul) will work to continue the destruction of the American people, their consititution, their way of life which the soi-disant global aristocracy begruges us.
The Chinese dictators know that their will never be secure as long as the idea of freedom remains in the world. The Zionist merchant bankers know that as long as the American middle-class exists -- people who know too much about the money power's profiting role in the world's great wars, revolutions and economic calamities -- they cannot be secure in their domination of the world. And so they both mean to kill us -- after first destroying us economically (look around you) and militarily (urban warfare by our soldiers against all Islam -- and infiltration of our military command by secretly anti-American agents of Israel) and psychologically (check the media) -- so that our conquest, mass murder (the way the Iraqi intelligencia are being murdered by Mossad hit men) and flooding of the by a Babel of ignorant foreigners (most Mexicans in the US are simply stupid led-by-the-nose Marxists in their opposition to globalism if they have any political awareness at all -- absolutely no idea of who Jefferson was or how he differs from Bush-Clinton -- much less who Ron Paul is and what he stands for.
This is the one reality I've been waking up to every morning. I've known if for years. I get worn out saying it. How often should I say it? I know I have not said it enough. Let me say it again: Both political parties are pushing candidates who are part of an ongoing plot of subversion -- their goal is to overthrow the American people and the type of goverment they believe in -- believe in but have not enjoyed since the 1920's and a little bit in the late 1940's up to the election of Eisenhower and the fall of Joe McCarthy (who was right about everything , as it turns out)
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
-----------------------------------------------
The Real Reason for Bush's Invasion of Iraq is a National Security Secret
By Paul Craig Roberts
American soldiers have been fighting and dying in Iraq since 2003, and Americans do not know why.
All the reasons President Bush gave us for his war are false. Bush said he invaded Iraq "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people."
We now know that these were false claims. Disinformation about Iraq was produced by a special unit within the Pentagon run by Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Feith. The unit operated outside the normal intelligence channels of the CIA and DIA. Its purpose was to create false intelligence to enable Bush to initiate war with Iraq.
Did President Bush know that the claims put into his speeches by his speechwriters was false?
Who instructed Bush's speechwriters to incorporate known lies into the President's speeches?
Why did Vice President Cheney, the Secretary of State, the National Security Advisor, and the Secretary of Defense all lie to the American people and to the entire world?
What is the real agenda?
Millions of Americans have come to their own conclusions about the reasons for Bush's invasion:
(1) Oil: the US government wants to hold on to power by expanding its control over oil, and Bush and Cheney want to reward their oil company cronies.
(2) Military-security complex: Police agencies favor war as a means of expanding their power, and military industries favor war as a means of expanding their profits.
(3) Neoconservative ideology: Neocons' believe in "American exceptionalism" and claim that America's virtue gives the US government the right and the obligation to impose US hegemony on the rest of the world, especially in the Middle East where independent Muslim states object to Israel's theft of Palestine.
(4) Karl Rove: Rove used the "war president" role to rescue Bush from attack by Democrats as an illegitimate president elected by one vote of the US Supreme Court.
(5) American self-righteousness over 9/11 and lust for revenge.
All of these reasons came together to make a cruel war on an innocent people.
There may be other reasons about which we know not.
As it is now recognized that every reason for the war is false or illegitimate, the question is: why does Bush insist on persisting with a costly war, the express reasons for which are now known to be mistakes? There were no weapons of mass destruction, no connections to al Qaeda, and Bush has installed a puppet Iraqi government that cannot venture outside the heavily fortified and US protected "green zone." The Iraqi government governs nothing.
War without cause is murder, not war.
That Bush persists with a war for which he can provide no legitimate reason indicates that there is a secret agenda that has not been shared with the American people. Are we experiencing the privatization of the US government by police agencies, the military-security complex, and the Israel Lobby?
That the American people and their elected representatives continue to tolerate a war that has killed and maimed thousands of their own soldiers, destroyed the infrastructure of a country,
killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians and created 4 million refugees for no known reason raises serious questions about the morals of the American people.
Is the impotence of the peace movement due to the power of the Israel Lobby or have Americans become morally degenerate as commentators increasingly assert?
One indication would be the response of presidential candidates to the gratuitous and failed war. What we saw at the Republican presidential candidates' debate on June 5 is inconsistent with the self-esteem of the American people. All of the leading Republican presidential candidates openly and nonchalantly endorsed using nuclear weapons against Iran unless Iran abandons its right to enrich uranium under the non-proliferation treaty, to which Iran is a signatory (unlike nuclear-armed Israel, India, and US puppet Pakistan).
What is moral degeneracy if it is not using nuclear weapons to murder masses of innocent civilians and spread deadly radioactivity over vast areas merely in order to force a country to do as we order? If this isn't barbarism, what is barbarism?
Do the American people realize that the frontrunners for the Republican presidential nomination are monsters who want to murder people who have done us no harm?
After five years of war that has achieved no noble purpose, no valid aim, indeed, no aim at all except perhaps Osama bin Laden's aim of stirring up uncontrollable strife in the Middle East, how can Republicans cheer for candidates who preach a wider war and the use of nuclear weapons against defenseless people?
Is the approval lavished on Republican presidential candidates, who are willing to use nuclear weapons as means of terrorizing Muslim peoples, an indication that the American people have morphed into inhuman monsters?
If not, what does it indicate? Ignorant fanaticism? Paranoia? Blind hatred? The belief that no one is of any value but Americans?
For six and one-half years the Bush Regime has relied on coercion, intimidation, war, and threats of war. Diplomacy and good will have been shunned. The regime's blatant warmongering has resurrected the nuclear arms race. China and Russia regard America's drive for world hegemony with great alarm. China has put nuclear ICBMs on mobile platforms to increase their survivability in event of an American attack. Russia has developed new multi-warhead ICBMs, which can penetrate any known missile defense, and new cruise missiles that Putin says will be targeted on Europe if the US persists in its aggressive military encirclement of Russia.
An administration that resurrects the threat of nuclear Armageddon so that its cronies in the military-security complex can become still richer is evil beyond compare.
Paul Craig Roberts wrote the Kemp-Roth bill and was assistant secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was associate editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and contributing editor of National Review. He is author or co-author of eight books, including The Supply-Side Revolution (Harvard University Press). He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon chair in political economy, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and senior research fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He has contributed to numerous scholarly journals and testified before Congress on 30 occasions. He has been awarded the U.S. Treasury's Meritorious Service Award and the French Legion of Honor. He was a reviewer for the Journal of Political Economy under editor Robert Mundell
(yahoo.group)
bin66 - 12. Jun, 01:01
