Khazars, Communists, Zionists And These united States
KHAZARS, COMMUNISTS, ZIONISTS AND THESE UNITED STATES Part 1
July 31, 2008
by Alan Stang
I routinely receive a flood of messages about Khazars. Every other message includes the term “Zionists” or “Zionism.” I exaggerate, but only a little. The messages say innumerable people, things and movements are “Zionist.” One starts to wonder what the word really means. If it means everything, it means nothing. There is also something called the “Jewish Conspiracy,” which is related to Zionism and is trying to conquer the world. The Khazars are an important element in this.
According to those messages, everything that goes wrong is caused by a Jew. The Jews are into everything. The theory says the problem is even worse than you may think, because, if you look long enough, you will find that malefactors who are purportedly Christians are Jews who changed their names. For instance, Roosevelt invariably is “Rosenfeld.” Rockefeller is “Rockenfelder” or some variant thereof. Again, that is the theory, usually expressed as an axiom; I have never seen any proof a professional would set in type. You never can be sure a man isn’t Jewish.
I haven’t ever said anything about all this. It is a diversion, a calculated distraction from the battle for Western civilization; but, again, it now appears to be arriving at a crescendo, maybe because of the speculation that the U.S. will attack Iran, so judicious comment could be helpful. First, who and what are the mysterious Khazars; how do they fit into all this? Every message that mentions them does so with contempt, with fear and suspicion.
Scholars have written about them for centuries. In our time, it was Arthur Koestler who brought them to general, public attention. Koestler was a Hungarian who became a British subject. He was a Communist Party member for some years, then quit and attacked it. He was a prolific author and a Jew. Koestler and his wife were found dead together. Some observers think they were murdered.
The Khazars were a people who ruled in what is now Ukraine and southern Russia, beginning in about the eighth century, A.D. To the west was Christianity; to the south Islam. Arthur Koestler wrote a book about them, The Thirteenth Tribe: the Khazar empire and its heritage (London, Hutchinson, 1976), because to escape domination by either of those two vibrant religions, they formally converted to Judaism.
Koestler says these converts henceforth became a major percentage of the Ashkenazic Jewish population, the Jews in central and Eastern Europe, as opposed to the Sephardim, the Jews in the west. And some observers have seized upon this history to claim that today’s Jews cannot be lineal descendants of the children of Israel. According to this theory, today’s “Jews” are really Khazars.
I do not pretend to understand the reason some patriots consider this theory so important. It is tempting to say the reason is obvious “anti-semitism,” but that generic, one-size-fits-all explanation – like the Khazar story itself – is suspiciously too simple. What we can mention with authority is that Arthur Koestler himself, author of the theory, does not say all of today’s “Jews” are Khazars. Some undoubtedly are authentic children of Israel, but it is impossible at this distance to say who they are, which means that while his revelations are immensely interesting, they cannot serve as the basis of policy or even attitude.
On the other hand, if today’s “Jews” are not really Jews, if they are not lineal descendants of the Jews mentioned in scripture (I use the King James Version, published almost four hundred years ago), then there can be no “Jewish conspiracy” without men to man it. It would make more sense to talk about a “Khazar conspiracy.”
There is also the question of when the children of Israel were still the genuine children. Obviously, they were the children at the moment God adopted them. Remember, however that as soon as He did so, they went wrong. Almost from the beginning, they went a-whoring. God tells them to stay home with their own wives. Instead, we constantly find them shacked up and bedded down with strange women, and the Lord is furious.
Abraham cohabited with Hagar, an Egyptian. Joseph married Asenath, another Egyptian. Moses married Zipporah, a Midianite. David’s mother was a Moabite. His wife was a princess of Geshur. Solomon had hundreds of “strange women.” How he could stand on his feet unaided I don’t know, but an army of “polluted” infants must have flowed from those unions with Ammonite, Hittite, Zidonian and Edomite women.
Ruth was another Moabitess, which means that even the earthly antecedents of Jesus Christ were not kosher. So who were the children of Israel? When were they pure enough? If the Khazar infiltration bred the children out of existence, did not the intermarriage narrated much earlier in scripture do the same? If so, Judaism would be more a matter of what you believe and less of your DNA.
Also, the Khazars were only one recent tribe among many that converted. There were also the Falasha of Abyssinia, who are black; the Chinese Jews of Kai-Feng, who look Chinese; the dark olive Yemenite Jews; and the Jewish Berber tribes of the Sahara, who look like Tuaregs. Who is Jewish? Who is not?
But now here comes the big surprise. According to Koestler, the Khazars do not deserve the opprobrium they get; on the contrary, they should be saluted. By now you certainly know that the French saved western civilization in 732, when Charles Martel, “the Hammer,” and his Frankish knights finally defeated the invading Muslims pouring through the Pyrenees from conquered Spain.
Did you also know that at just about the same time, the Khazars were saving western civilization by defeating the Muslims pouring through the Caucasus? Had the Khazars failed, the probability is great that today you would be talking Arabic. Koestler quotes as follows Professor Douglas Dunlop of Columbia University, a leading authority on the Khazars:
“The Khazar country . . . lay across the natural line of advance of the Arabs. Within a few years of the death of Muhammad (AD 632) the armies of the Caliphate, sweeping northward through the wreckage of two empires and carrying all before them, reached the great mountain barrier of the Caucasus. . . . The wars of the Arabs and the Khazars, which lasted more than a hundred years, though little known, have thus considerable historical importance. . . . The victorious Muslims were met and held by the forces of the Khazar kingdom. . . . It can . . . scarcely be doubted that but for the existence of the Khazars . . . Byzantium, the bulwark of European civilization in the east, would have found itself outflanked by the Arabs, and the history of Christendom and Islam might well have been very different from what we know.”
In fact, in 732, the same year the French beat the Muslims in the west, the future Emperor Constantine V married a Khazar princess after a resounding victory over the Arabs, and their son became Emperor Leo IV, known as Leo the Khazar. So it is not an exaggeration to say that the Khazars saved Rome and Christianity. They do not deserve the denigration of some modern commentators. Remember that I got all this from the same source these commentators use.
Now let’s look at Zionism. This is a political movement to establish a national home for Jews, or for people who call themselves “Jews,” or for Khazars; you pick one. First, consider that Zionism and Judaism are two different things. Indeed, most Zionists are not Jews. In fact, it would not be far afield to say that only a small minority of Zionists are Jews.
What? Where did I get that? Presumably the Jews in Israel are Zionists, or they would leave. But there are only a few million Israelis. In the United States, there are scores of millions of Christians in mainline churches who are Zionists and who support Israel as staunchly as any Israeli, with funds as well as prayer. Their support emanates from prophecy, which you may or may not endorse, but it has helped Israel survive.
Second, consider that tens of thousands of Jews not only are not Zionists; they fervently oppose Zionism. They believe that Zionism is condemned by Holy Scripture. For instance, go to Brooklyn in New York City if you dare. The Williamsburg section near the bridge is teeming with Hasidic Jews. These are the men in the long black coats, the white shirts without ties, the flat, black hats, the beards and long curly sideburns they are forbidden to cut. Probably to a man, these tens of thousands of Jews strongly oppose Zionism, and they have wives.
I suppose if you are stupid you could try to build a case that these teeming Jews are “anti-semites.” My guess is that before you get back across the bridge into Manhattan and safety, you would be hit upside the head with a slab of gefilte fish or a matzo. Meanwhile, be back here next week for more about Zionism, Communism and American policy.
http://tinyurl.com/6zqunv
KHAZARS, COMMUNISTS, ZIONISTS AND THESE UNITED STATES Part 2
August 7, 2008
by Alan Stang
According to the “Jewish Conspiracy” theorists, what I routinely call the conspiracy for world government is run by Jews, proof of which is the presence on the roster of many Jewish names. And those names are certainly there. Why would this surprise anyone? There have been (in)famous Jewish gangsters like Bugsy Siegel and Meyer Lansky. Jews are as good (and as bad) as anyone else. They are into everything; why not the conspiracy? It would be surprising if no Jews were there.
Indeed, has it occurred to anyone to observe that there are many, many more “Christian” than “Jewish” names on the conspiracy’s rolls? Why? Obviously because there are many more “Christians.” For every Heinz Kissinger we name, we could probably name three or four Jimbo Carters and Juan McCains. If we are going to decide what kind of conspiracy it is based on a conspirator’s ethnic and religious origin, shouldn’t we more accurately call it a “Christian” conspiracy? Just asking.
I don’t want to get controversial here. Stalin started out as a Christian seminarian named Djugashvili, presumably studying to be a priest, but he developed a proclivity to bank robbery. Could we safely assume he was not a Jew? But you certainly would not call him a Christian. Hitler came to us from Christian antecedents. Would you call him a Christian? The sensible answer appears to be that when such psychopaths enter the world conspiracy, they no longer qualify for that humble status.
For the same reason, the man who raped that lady and bit her lip bloody while he was Arkansas attorney general, loves to appear in public with a big Bible. No one with any sense would call him a Christian. We know from the inside that Jorge W. Boosh ridicules Christians in private, giving the lie to the preposterous theory that he is a Christian. Question: If Christians lose that status when the conspiracy recruits them, why does not the same principle apply to Jews? Why are the Christians no longer Christians, but the Jews remain Jews? Just asking.
Much of the commentary I have seen on the subject is written by outsiders with a chain saw to grind and it treats Jews as a homogeneous group. Is this not odd? In the non-Jewish population there is every disparity and disagreement. There have been Christians killing each other in war and at the stake. There is Arkansas rapist Clinton on one hand and sublime Christian gentleman and warrior Robert E. Lee on the other.
The clue that tells us something is wrong is that much of the discussion concerns “the Jews,” as if all Jews agree about everything important. It is obvious that “the Jews” are a propaganda concoction, skillfully manipulated by con men, in the same way that the totally discredited shakedown artist from Chicago and the sharpster with the hair claim to speak for thirty million black people in this country. “The Negro believes . . . .” Remember?
We have already seen that there is enormous disagreement among Jews on the subject of Zionism. The number of Jews who oppose it is huge. Most people don’t know that because our Communist media suppress it. Widespread understanding of that fact would dramatically change the Zionist debate. It would certainly dilute Zionism’s value as a propaganda weapon the conspiracy for world government has effectively used.
The children of Israel murmured against Moses. The Lord had to swallow them up. My King James Version of scripture says Jesus is a Jew. The “Jewish Conspiracy” folks say He isn’t. My Strong’s Concordance includes innumerable references to “Jews.” The “Jewish Conspiracy” folks say scripture does not. They are furious because Jews colluded in the execution of Jesus, which according to scripture is certainly true – the Jews responsible boasted about it – but at the same time they say “the Jews” did not exist. So were “the Jews” responsible for the execution of Jesus or not?
Christianity began inside Judaism. All the first Christians were Jews. They believed Jesus was the Messiah they awaited. Other Jews opposed them. Stephen was a Jew. Other Jews stoned him. Saul, a Jew, an accessory to the murder, became Paul. Three thousand Jews saw the light and became Christians. Christians were not called “Christians” before Antioch. They were simply Jews who believed.
For centuries, Christians killed each other. Hindus kill Christians and Muslims. Muslims kill everyone, including other Muslims. Everyone knows this. What has been suppressed is the sorry fact that Jews kill Jews. Indeed, the dispute among Jews about Zionism and other issues is more of a civil war than a disagreement, a literal civil war that is deadly.
Again, for the reason cited above, few people, even few Jews, are aware of it. Marvin Antelman is a scientist in New England; he is an American patriot, a Jew, a rabbi and a Zionist. His book, in two volumes is To Eliminate the Opiate (Santa Monica, Zionist Book Club, 2007).
I believe I do not exaggerate (maybe a bit) when I say that you have little chance of understanding all this until you read it. Not only is the rabbi brilliant; he is also a Zionist who passionately opposes the conspiracy for world government and has risked life and business in the battle. For instance, Rabbi Antelman was the head of a Bet Din, a Jewish court that excommunicated Soviet agent Heinz Kissinger. Did you know about that? Hmm! Why not? Everything I am telling you here comes from newly published volume two.
By now, we know that the Communists have infiltrated all religions. They do that because Stalin discovered the “attack from without” utterly failed. The more clergymen he killed, the more they sprang up. He reversed his strategy, implementing the new “attack from within.” Instead of killing priests, he sent secret policemen into the church, where they pretended to be priests. Over the years, the Soviets have infiltrated all the Christian denominations. That is the reason so many churches appear to have gone crazy. See also my book, The Actor: The True Story of John Foster Dulles, where I discuss Soviet infiltration of religion in detail.
Stalin did the same thing to the Jews. Apostate “Rabbi” Alexander Bittleman helped mastermind the murder of Trotsky in Mexico. Two Communist “Jews” helped Stalin bring Hitler to power in Germany, after which Stalin killed them. The KGB operated a Yeshiva (a Jewish school) to train “rabbis” in Romania. One of its graduates was the chief “rabbi” of Kiev.
These are just a few of endless examples. These people were not Jews, just as the handsome, charming, perfumed fraud in the robes on the KGB payroll was not a Russian Orthodox priest. (Antelman, p. 63) Stalin was planning to exterminate all Jews in the Soviet Union. The trains and the equipment were ready when he died. (P. 70) Had he not died when he did, we would be hearing about Holocaust II.
David Ben-Gurion was the first prime minister of Israel. Ben-Gurion killed thousands of Jews. What? The prime minister of Israel killed thousands of Jews? Yes, Pilgrim. If you exclude Titus and Hitler, you would probably find it hard to name someone who killed more Jews than he did. First, he was among those who sabotaged attempts to get Jews out of Hitler Europe. So, he shared culpability for their murders. He collaborated with the English to hunt down Jews trying to get into Palestine.
The Altalena was a ship loaded with five thousand rifles, four million rounds of ammo, thousands of bombs, submachine guns and vehicles, along with nine hundred soldiers. On June 22, 1948, during Israel’s War for Independence, the Altalena put ashore at a beach about twenty miles north of Tel Aviv. While the Jews who had brought all this ordnance struggled to unload, Ben-Gurion’s “Jews” ambushed them, opened fire, killing and maiming, and sank the Altalena with its cargo. (P. 163) The Jews fighting for independence did not receive it.
Why would Ben-Gurion do all this? He and his colleagues, like Golda Meir, Yitzak Rabin, Shimon Peres & Co., were Reds, active in the Socialist International, who paraded under red flags on May Day. Communism was obviously more important to these traitors than anything else. Rabin for instance sent police to beat up religious Jews, threw rabbis into jail and even tried to intimidate Jews in the United States. If being a Jew is a matter of what you believe, he was clearly not a Jew.
Antelman writes that religious Jews immigrating to Israel “were shocked to find that their children had been kidnapped and sold for adoption, to line the coffers of the national socialist party of Israel, called the Histadrut.” (P. 219) An investigator was able to prove five thousand such kidnappings. Rabin threw him into jail for six years. Hint: How do you say “national socialist” in German?
Now, what about the big names in the “Jewish Conspiracy,” the Rothschilds, the Warburgs, the Schiffs, the Morgenthaus, etc.? In the Antelman book (p. 166), we read that they strenuously opposed Zionism, opposed creation of a Jewish state. When they saw they couldn’t stop it, they came aboard and took control.
Remember that Nazism and Communism are two versions of the same thing. On page 215 of the Antelman book there is a picture of a Nazi Labor Day emblem. On it are the hammer and sickle and a likeness of the young Karl Marx. On May 1, 1927, Hitler said this: "We are socialists. We are enemies of today's capitalistic system . . . .” Indeed, Nobel Prize economist Friedrich Hayek reports that as late as February, 1941, Hitler said, “Basically National Socialism and Marxism are the same.”
No doubt this helps explain why Communist “Jews” could collaborate with Adolf, even in the destruction of real Jews. Antelman writes for instance of just one incident in which they purposely sabotaged the rescue of 120,000 Jews (p. 218) Remember also that Karl Marx hated Jews and expressed that hatred regularly in the pages of Horace Greeley’s New York Tribune. Marx was the author of A World Without Jews.
Marx said this: “The law of the Jew, lacking all solid foundation, is only a religious caricature of morality and of law in general, but it provides the formal rites in which the world of property clothes its transactions.” Compare that to this statement by Hitler: “What is the object of the Jew's worship in this world? Usury. What is his worldly god? Money. . . . The bill of exchange is the Jew's real God. . . .” Oh, excuse me, did I say Hitler said that? No, I misspoke. Marx said it as well.
Obviously, all this is a lot more complicated than our Communist media tell us it is. And I have given you just a few examples. First, there is no such thing as “the Jews.” Jewry includes different kinds of Jews, just as Christianity includes different kinds of Christians. There are religious Jews who oppose Zionism. There are just as religious Jews who favor Zionism. Rabbi Antelman is one of them.
There are Jews who endorse assimilation in the nations where they live; there are Jews who oppose it. There are Communist “Jews” who pretend to be Jews to garner support and raise funds in Hollyweird from dumb Jews like Barbra. These are the kinds of “Jews” who have run Israel from the beginning almost all the time and who presumably belong to what Jesus, King of the Jews, called the “synagogue of Satan.”
There are passionately anti-Communist, patriotic Jews like Rabbi Antelman. There are “Jews” at the top of the conspiracy for world government. And there are Jews who vigorously oppose them. Did I leave anyone out? So, if anyone starts talking about “the Jews,” you can be pretty sure he either is ignorant or is a conspirator himself.
More and more it emerges that Jews are the victims, not the perpetrators of the conspiracy. Most Jews have never heard of any conspiracy, “Jewish” or otherwise. But don’t waste precious time presenting all this to a “Jewish conspiracy” believer. In my experience, that belief is not a mere disagreement about the facts; it is a derangement that is usually incurable.
You will notice that however much evidence you present, the victim is uninterested, because his belief is not based on the facts. He will respond by repeating that so-and-so’s real name is really this and that. Of course, the conspiracy for world government uses this weapon brilliantly – and may even have devised it – to confuse and neutralize opposition.
So, if I am so smart, what’s my solution to the mess in the Middle East? What should we do about the bomb there waiting to explode? Sadly, I am not that smart. But I do have the perfect solution for the people of the United States. And it looks as if you will have to wait another week to hear it.
http://tinyurl.com/6s6y7m
July 31, 2008
by Alan Stang
I routinely receive a flood of messages about Khazars. Every other message includes the term “Zionists” or “Zionism.” I exaggerate, but only a little. The messages say innumerable people, things and movements are “Zionist.” One starts to wonder what the word really means. If it means everything, it means nothing. There is also something called the “Jewish Conspiracy,” which is related to Zionism and is trying to conquer the world. The Khazars are an important element in this.
According to those messages, everything that goes wrong is caused by a Jew. The Jews are into everything. The theory says the problem is even worse than you may think, because, if you look long enough, you will find that malefactors who are purportedly Christians are Jews who changed their names. For instance, Roosevelt invariably is “Rosenfeld.” Rockefeller is “Rockenfelder” or some variant thereof. Again, that is the theory, usually expressed as an axiom; I have never seen any proof a professional would set in type. You never can be sure a man isn’t Jewish.
I haven’t ever said anything about all this. It is a diversion, a calculated distraction from the battle for Western civilization; but, again, it now appears to be arriving at a crescendo, maybe because of the speculation that the U.S. will attack Iran, so judicious comment could be helpful. First, who and what are the mysterious Khazars; how do they fit into all this? Every message that mentions them does so with contempt, with fear and suspicion.
Scholars have written about them for centuries. In our time, it was Arthur Koestler who brought them to general, public attention. Koestler was a Hungarian who became a British subject. He was a Communist Party member for some years, then quit and attacked it. He was a prolific author and a Jew. Koestler and his wife were found dead together. Some observers think they were murdered.
The Khazars were a people who ruled in what is now Ukraine and southern Russia, beginning in about the eighth century, A.D. To the west was Christianity; to the south Islam. Arthur Koestler wrote a book about them, The Thirteenth Tribe: the Khazar empire and its heritage (London, Hutchinson, 1976), because to escape domination by either of those two vibrant religions, they formally converted to Judaism.
Koestler says these converts henceforth became a major percentage of the Ashkenazic Jewish population, the Jews in central and Eastern Europe, as opposed to the Sephardim, the Jews in the west. And some observers have seized upon this history to claim that today’s Jews cannot be lineal descendants of the children of Israel. According to this theory, today’s “Jews” are really Khazars.
I do not pretend to understand the reason some patriots consider this theory so important. It is tempting to say the reason is obvious “anti-semitism,” but that generic, one-size-fits-all explanation – like the Khazar story itself – is suspiciously too simple. What we can mention with authority is that Arthur Koestler himself, author of the theory, does not say all of today’s “Jews” are Khazars. Some undoubtedly are authentic children of Israel, but it is impossible at this distance to say who they are, which means that while his revelations are immensely interesting, they cannot serve as the basis of policy or even attitude.
On the other hand, if today’s “Jews” are not really Jews, if they are not lineal descendants of the Jews mentioned in scripture (I use the King James Version, published almost four hundred years ago), then there can be no “Jewish conspiracy” without men to man it. It would make more sense to talk about a “Khazar conspiracy.”
There is also the question of when the children of Israel were still the genuine children. Obviously, they were the children at the moment God adopted them. Remember, however that as soon as He did so, they went wrong. Almost from the beginning, they went a-whoring. God tells them to stay home with their own wives. Instead, we constantly find them shacked up and bedded down with strange women, and the Lord is furious.
Abraham cohabited with Hagar, an Egyptian. Joseph married Asenath, another Egyptian. Moses married Zipporah, a Midianite. David’s mother was a Moabite. His wife was a princess of Geshur. Solomon had hundreds of “strange women.” How he could stand on his feet unaided I don’t know, but an army of “polluted” infants must have flowed from those unions with Ammonite, Hittite, Zidonian and Edomite women.
Ruth was another Moabitess, which means that even the earthly antecedents of Jesus Christ were not kosher. So who were the children of Israel? When were they pure enough? If the Khazar infiltration bred the children out of existence, did not the intermarriage narrated much earlier in scripture do the same? If so, Judaism would be more a matter of what you believe and less of your DNA.
Also, the Khazars were only one recent tribe among many that converted. There were also the Falasha of Abyssinia, who are black; the Chinese Jews of Kai-Feng, who look Chinese; the dark olive Yemenite Jews; and the Jewish Berber tribes of the Sahara, who look like Tuaregs. Who is Jewish? Who is not?
But now here comes the big surprise. According to Koestler, the Khazars do not deserve the opprobrium they get; on the contrary, they should be saluted. By now you certainly know that the French saved western civilization in 732, when Charles Martel, “the Hammer,” and his Frankish knights finally defeated the invading Muslims pouring through the Pyrenees from conquered Spain.
Did you also know that at just about the same time, the Khazars were saving western civilization by defeating the Muslims pouring through the Caucasus? Had the Khazars failed, the probability is great that today you would be talking Arabic. Koestler quotes as follows Professor Douglas Dunlop of Columbia University, a leading authority on the Khazars:
“The Khazar country . . . lay across the natural line of advance of the Arabs. Within a few years of the death of Muhammad (AD 632) the armies of the Caliphate, sweeping northward through the wreckage of two empires and carrying all before them, reached the great mountain barrier of the Caucasus. . . . The wars of the Arabs and the Khazars, which lasted more than a hundred years, though little known, have thus considerable historical importance. . . . The victorious Muslims were met and held by the forces of the Khazar kingdom. . . . It can . . . scarcely be doubted that but for the existence of the Khazars . . . Byzantium, the bulwark of European civilization in the east, would have found itself outflanked by the Arabs, and the history of Christendom and Islam might well have been very different from what we know.”
In fact, in 732, the same year the French beat the Muslims in the west, the future Emperor Constantine V married a Khazar princess after a resounding victory over the Arabs, and their son became Emperor Leo IV, known as Leo the Khazar. So it is not an exaggeration to say that the Khazars saved Rome and Christianity. They do not deserve the denigration of some modern commentators. Remember that I got all this from the same source these commentators use.
Now let’s look at Zionism. This is a political movement to establish a national home for Jews, or for people who call themselves “Jews,” or for Khazars; you pick one. First, consider that Zionism and Judaism are two different things. Indeed, most Zionists are not Jews. In fact, it would not be far afield to say that only a small minority of Zionists are Jews.
What? Where did I get that? Presumably the Jews in Israel are Zionists, or they would leave. But there are only a few million Israelis. In the United States, there are scores of millions of Christians in mainline churches who are Zionists and who support Israel as staunchly as any Israeli, with funds as well as prayer. Their support emanates from prophecy, which you may or may not endorse, but it has helped Israel survive.
Second, consider that tens of thousands of Jews not only are not Zionists; they fervently oppose Zionism. They believe that Zionism is condemned by Holy Scripture. For instance, go to Brooklyn in New York City if you dare. The Williamsburg section near the bridge is teeming with Hasidic Jews. These are the men in the long black coats, the white shirts without ties, the flat, black hats, the beards and long curly sideburns they are forbidden to cut. Probably to a man, these tens of thousands of Jews strongly oppose Zionism, and they have wives.
I suppose if you are stupid you could try to build a case that these teeming Jews are “anti-semites.” My guess is that before you get back across the bridge into Manhattan and safety, you would be hit upside the head with a slab of gefilte fish or a matzo. Meanwhile, be back here next week for more about Zionism, Communism and American policy.
http://tinyurl.com/6zqunv
KHAZARS, COMMUNISTS, ZIONISTS AND THESE UNITED STATES Part 2
August 7, 2008
by Alan Stang
According to the “Jewish Conspiracy” theorists, what I routinely call the conspiracy for world government is run by Jews, proof of which is the presence on the roster of many Jewish names. And those names are certainly there. Why would this surprise anyone? There have been (in)famous Jewish gangsters like Bugsy Siegel and Meyer Lansky. Jews are as good (and as bad) as anyone else. They are into everything; why not the conspiracy? It would be surprising if no Jews were there.
Indeed, has it occurred to anyone to observe that there are many, many more “Christian” than “Jewish” names on the conspiracy’s rolls? Why? Obviously because there are many more “Christians.” For every Heinz Kissinger we name, we could probably name three or four Jimbo Carters and Juan McCains. If we are going to decide what kind of conspiracy it is based on a conspirator’s ethnic and religious origin, shouldn’t we more accurately call it a “Christian” conspiracy? Just asking.
I don’t want to get controversial here. Stalin started out as a Christian seminarian named Djugashvili, presumably studying to be a priest, but he developed a proclivity to bank robbery. Could we safely assume he was not a Jew? But you certainly would not call him a Christian. Hitler came to us from Christian antecedents. Would you call him a Christian? The sensible answer appears to be that when such psychopaths enter the world conspiracy, they no longer qualify for that humble status.
For the same reason, the man who raped that lady and bit her lip bloody while he was Arkansas attorney general, loves to appear in public with a big Bible. No one with any sense would call him a Christian. We know from the inside that Jorge W. Boosh ridicules Christians in private, giving the lie to the preposterous theory that he is a Christian. Question: If Christians lose that status when the conspiracy recruits them, why does not the same principle apply to Jews? Why are the Christians no longer Christians, but the Jews remain Jews? Just asking.
Much of the commentary I have seen on the subject is written by outsiders with a chain saw to grind and it treats Jews as a homogeneous group. Is this not odd? In the non-Jewish population there is every disparity and disagreement. There have been Christians killing each other in war and at the stake. There is Arkansas rapist Clinton on one hand and sublime Christian gentleman and warrior Robert E. Lee on the other.
The clue that tells us something is wrong is that much of the discussion concerns “the Jews,” as if all Jews agree about everything important. It is obvious that “the Jews” are a propaganda concoction, skillfully manipulated by con men, in the same way that the totally discredited shakedown artist from Chicago and the sharpster with the hair claim to speak for thirty million black people in this country. “The Negro believes . . . .” Remember?
We have already seen that there is enormous disagreement among Jews on the subject of Zionism. The number of Jews who oppose it is huge. Most people don’t know that because our Communist media suppress it. Widespread understanding of that fact would dramatically change the Zionist debate. It would certainly dilute Zionism’s value as a propaganda weapon the conspiracy for world government has effectively used.
The children of Israel murmured against Moses. The Lord had to swallow them up. My King James Version of scripture says Jesus is a Jew. The “Jewish Conspiracy” folks say He isn’t. My Strong’s Concordance includes innumerable references to “Jews.” The “Jewish Conspiracy” folks say scripture does not. They are furious because Jews colluded in the execution of Jesus, which according to scripture is certainly true – the Jews responsible boasted about it – but at the same time they say “the Jews” did not exist. So were “the Jews” responsible for the execution of Jesus or not?
Christianity began inside Judaism. All the first Christians were Jews. They believed Jesus was the Messiah they awaited. Other Jews opposed them. Stephen was a Jew. Other Jews stoned him. Saul, a Jew, an accessory to the murder, became Paul. Three thousand Jews saw the light and became Christians. Christians were not called “Christians” before Antioch. They were simply Jews who believed.
For centuries, Christians killed each other. Hindus kill Christians and Muslims. Muslims kill everyone, including other Muslims. Everyone knows this. What has been suppressed is the sorry fact that Jews kill Jews. Indeed, the dispute among Jews about Zionism and other issues is more of a civil war than a disagreement, a literal civil war that is deadly.
Again, for the reason cited above, few people, even few Jews, are aware of it. Marvin Antelman is a scientist in New England; he is an American patriot, a Jew, a rabbi and a Zionist. His book, in two volumes is To Eliminate the Opiate (Santa Monica, Zionist Book Club, 2007).
I believe I do not exaggerate (maybe a bit) when I say that you have little chance of understanding all this until you read it. Not only is the rabbi brilliant; he is also a Zionist who passionately opposes the conspiracy for world government and has risked life and business in the battle. For instance, Rabbi Antelman was the head of a Bet Din, a Jewish court that excommunicated Soviet agent Heinz Kissinger. Did you know about that? Hmm! Why not? Everything I am telling you here comes from newly published volume two.
By now, we know that the Communists have infiltrated all religions. They do that because Stalin discovered the “attack from without” utterly failed. The more clergymen he killed, the more they sprang up. He reversed his strategy, implementing the new “attack from within.” Instead of killing priests, he sent secret policemen into the church, where they pretended to be priests. Over the years, the Soviets have infiltrated all the Christian denominations. That is the reason so many churches appear to have gone crazy. See also my book, The Actor: The True Story of John Foster Dulles, where I discuss Soviet infiltration of religion in detail.
Stalin did the same thing to the Jews. Apostate “Rabbi” Alexander Bittleman helped mastermind the murder of Trotsky in Mexico. Two Communist “Jews” helped Stalin bring Hitler to power in Germany, after which Stalin killed them. The KGB operated a Yeshiva (a Jewish school) to train “rabbis” in Romania. One of its graduates was the chief “rabbi” of Kiev.
These are just a few of endless examples. These people were not Jews, just as the handsome, charming, perfumed fraud in the robes on the KGB payroll was not a Russian Orthodox priest. (Antelman, p. 63) Stalin was planning to exterminate all Jews in the Soviet Union. The trains and the equipment were ready when he died. (P. 70) Had he not died when he did, we would be hearing about Holocaust II.
David Ben-Gurion was the first prime minister of Israel. Ben-Gurion killed thousands of Jews. What? The prime minister of Israel killed thousands of Jews? Yes, Pilgrim. If you exclude Titus and Hitler, you would probably find it hard to name someone who killed more Jews than he did. First, he was among those who sabotaged attempts to get Jews out of Hitler Europe. So, he shared culpability for their murders. He collaborated with the English to hunt down Jews trying to get into Palestine.
The Altalena was a ship loaded with five thousand rifles, four million rounds of ammo, thousands of bombs, submachine guns and vehicles, along with nine hundred soldiers. On June 22, 1948, during Israel’s War for Independence, the Altalena put ashore at a beach about twenty miles north of Tel Aviv. While the Jews who had brought all this ordnance struggled to unload, Ben-Gurion’s “Jews” ambushed them, opened fire, killing and maiming, and sank the Altalena with its cargo. (P. 163) The Jews fighting for independence did not receive it.
Why would Ben-Gurion do all this? He and his colleagues, like Golda Meir, Yitzak Rabin, Shimon Peres & Co., were Reds, active in the Socialist International, who paraded under red flags on May Day. Communism was obviously more important to these traitors than anything else. Rabin for instance sent police to beat up religious Jews, threw rabbis into jail and even tried to intimidate Jews in the United States. If being a Jew is a matter of what you believe, he was clearly not a Jew.
Antelman writes that religious Jews immigrating to Israel “were shocked to find that their children had been kidnapped and sold for adoption, to line the coffers of the national socialist party of Israel, called the Histadrut.” (P. 219) An investigator was able to prove five thousand such kidnappings. Rabin threw him into jail for six years. Hint: How do you say “national socialist” in German?
Now, what about the big names in the “Jewish Conspiracy,” the Rothschilds, the Warburgs, the Schiffs, the Morgenthaus, etc.? In the Antelman book (p. 166), we read that they strenuously opposed Zionism, opposed creation of a Jewish state. When they saw they couldn’t stop it, they came aboard and took control.
Remember that Nazism and Communism are two versions of the same thing. On page 215 of the Antelman book there is a picture of a Nazi Labor Day emblem. On it are the hammer and sickle and a likeness of the young Karl Marx. On May 1, 1927, Hitler said this: "We are socialists. We are enemies of today's capitalistic system . . . .” Indeed, Nobel Prize economist Friedrich Hayek reports that as late as February, 1941, Hitler said, “Basically National Socialism and Marxism are the same.”
No doubt this helps explain why Communist “Jews” could collaborate with Adolf, even in the destruction of real Jews. Antelman writes for instance of just one incident in which they purposely sabotaged the rescue of 120,000 Jews (p. 218) Remember also that Karl Marx hated Jews and expressed that hatred regularly in the pages of Horace Greeley’s New York Tribune. Marx was the author of A World Without Jews.
Marx said this: “The law of the Jew, lacking all solid foundation, is only a religious caricature of morality and of law in general, but it provides the formal rites in which the world of property clothes its transactions.” Compare that to this statement by Hitler: “What is the object of the Jew's worship in this world? Usury. What is his worldly god? Money. . . . The bill of exchange is the Jew's real God. . . .” Oh, excuse me, did I say Hitler said that? No, I misspoke. Marx said it as well.
Obviously, all this is a lot more complicated than our Communist media tell us it is. And I have given you just a few examples. First, there is no such thing as “the Jews.” Jewry includes different kinds of Jews, just as Christianity includes different kinds of Christians. There are religious Jews who oppose Zionism. There are just as religious Jews who favor Zionism. Rabbi Antelman is one of them.
There are Jews who endorse assimilation in the nations where they live; there are Jews who oppose it. There are Communist “Jews” who pretend to be Jews to garner support and raise funds in Hollyweird from dumb Jews like Barbra. These are the kinds of “Jews” who have run Israel from the beginning almost all the time and who presumably belong to what Jesus, King of the Jews, called the “synagogue of Satan.”
There are passionately anti-Communist, patriotic Jews like Rabbi Antelman. There are “Jews” at the top of the conspiracy for world government. And there are Jews who vigorously oppose them. Did I leave anyone out? So, if anyone starts talking about “the Jews,” you can be pretty sure he either is ignorant or is a conspirator himself.
More and more it emerges that Jews are the victims, not the perpetrators of the conspiracy. Most Jews have never heard of any conspiracy, “Jewish” or otherwise. But don’t waste precious time presenting all this to a “Jewish conspiracy” believer. In my experience, that belief is not a mere disagreement about the facts; it is a derangement that is usually incurable.
You will notice that however much evidence you present, the victim is uninterested, because his belief is not based on the facts. He will respond by repeating that so-and-so’s real name is really this and that. Of course, the conspiracy for world government uses this weapon brilliantly – and may even have devised it – to confuse and neutralize opposition.
So, if I am so smart, what’s my solution to the mess in the Middle East? What should we do about the bomb there waiting to explode? Sadly, I am not that smart. But I do have the perfect solution for the people of the United States. And it looks as if you will have to wait another week to hear it.
http://tinyurl.com/6s6y7m
bin66 - 13. Aug, 06:20
